[Abstract + References] Robotic and Sensor Technology for Upper Limb Rehabilitation – PM&R


Robotic and sensor-based neurologic rehabilitation for the upper limb is an established concept for motor learning and is recommended in many national guidelines. The complexity of the human hands and arms and the different activities of daily living are leading to an approach in which robotic and sensor-based devices are used in combination to fulfill the multiple requirements of this intervention. A multidisciplinary team of the Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi (FDG), an Italian nonprofit foundation, which spans across the entire Italian territory with 28 rehabilitation centers, developed a strategy for the implementation of robotic rehabilitation within the FDG centers. Using an ad hoc form developed by the team, 4 robotic and sensor-based devices were identified among the robotic therapy devices commercially available to treat the upper limb in a more comprehensive way (from the shoulder to the hand). Encouraging results from a pilot study, which compared this robotic approach with a conventional treatment, led to the deployment of the same set of robotic devices in 8 other FDG centers to start a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Efficiency and economic factors are just as important as clinical outcome. The comparison showed that robotic group therapy costs less than half per session in Germany than standard individual arm therapy with equivalent outcomes. To ensure access to high-quality therapy to the largest possible patient group and lower health care costs, robot-assisted group training is a likely option.



  1. Lo, A.C., Guarino, P.D., Richards, L.G. et al, Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. N Engl J Med2011;365:1749.
  2. Hesse, S., Heß, A., Werner, C.C., Kabbert, N., Buschfort, R. Effect on arm function and cost of robot assisted group therapy in subacute patients with stroke and a moderately to severely affected arm: A randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil2014;28:637–647.
  3. Smith BM, Albus JS, Barbera AJ. A Glossary of Terms for Robotics. Prepared for U.S. Air Force Materials Laboratory Integrated Computer Aided Manufacturing Program. U.S. Department of Commerce. National Bureau of Standards. 1981. Available at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GOVPUB-C13-7a9025561f229e1f7fb504ace852d602/pdf/GOVPUB-C13-7a9025561f229e1f7fb504ace852d602.pdf. Accessed September 5, 2018..

  4. Feigin, V.L., Forouzanfar, M.H., Krishnamurthi, R. et al, Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990-2010: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet2014;383:245–255.
  5. Mehrholz, J., Pohl, M., Platz, T., Kugler, J., Elsner, B. Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke.Cochrane Database Syst Rev2015;11:CD006876.
  6. Kolominsky-Rabas, P.L., Heuschmann, P.U., Marschall, D. et al, Lifetime cost of ischemic stroke in Germany: Results and national projections from a population-based stroke registry. The Erlangen Stroke Project. Stroke2006;37:1179–1183.
  7. Ringelstein, E.B., Nabavi, D.G. Der ischämische Schlaganfall: Eine praxisorientierte Darstellung von Pathophysiologie, Diagnostik und Therapie. 1st ed. KohlhammerGermany2007.
  8. Deutscher Verband für Physiotherapie. Aktuelle Arbeitsmarktdaten veröffentlicht—Fachkräftemangel in der Physiotherapie mehr als deutlich. Available at: https://www.physio-deutschland.de/fachkreise/news-bundesweit/einzelansicht/artikel/Aktuelle-Arbeitsmarktdaten-veroeffentlicht-Fachkraeftemangel-in-der-Physiotherapie-mehr-als-deutlich.html. Published March 2017. Accessed April 5, 2018..

  9. Wright, D.L., Shea, C.H. Cognition and motor skill acquisition: Contextual dependencies. in: C.R. Reynolds (Ed.) Cognitive assessment: A multidisciplinary perspectiveSpringer Verlag USBoston, MA1994:89–106.
  10. Masiero, S., Armani, M., Rosati, G. Upper-limb robot-assisted therapy in rehabilitation of acute stroke patients: Focused review and results of new randomized controlled trial. J Rehabil Res Dev2011;48:355–366.
  11. Mehrholz, J., Hädrich, A., Platz, T., Kugler, J., Pohl, M. Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving generic activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2012;6:CD006876.
  12. Norouzi-Gheidari, N., Archambault, P.S., Fung, J. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on stroke rehabilitation in upper limbs: Systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. J Rehabil Res Dev2012;49:479–496.
  13. Masiero, S., Carraro, E., Ferraro, C., Gallina, P., Rossi, A., Rosati, G. Upper limb rehabilitation robotics after stroke: A perspective from the University of Padua, Italy. J Rehabil Med2009;41:981–985.
  14. Wagner, T.H., Lo, A.C., Peduzzi, P. et al, An economic analysis of robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. Stroke2011;42:2630–2632.
  15. Masiero, S., Poli, P., Armani, M., Ferlini, G., Rizzello, R., Rosati, G. Robotic upper limb rehabilitation after acute stroke by NeReBot: Evaluation of treatment costs. Biomed Res Int2014;2014:265634.
  16. Aprile I. Multi-segmental robotic and technological upper limb rehabilitation in stroke. Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus. Clinical trial registration number NCT02879279. Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov..

  17. De Wit, L., Putman, K., Dejaeger, E. et al, Use of time by stroke patients: A comparison of four European rehabilitation centers. Stroke2005;36:1977–1983.
  18. Lee, K.B., Lim, S.H., Kim, K.H. et al, Six-month functional recovery of stroke patients: A multi-time-point study. Int J Rehabil Res2015;38:173–180.
  19. Veerbeek, J.M., van Wegen, E., van Peppen, R. et al, What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One2014;9 (e87987).


via Robotic and Sensor Technology for Upper Limb Rehabilitation – PM&R

, , , , , , , ,

  1. Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: