via
References
- 1.Nudo RJ, Wise BM, SiFuentes F, Milliken GW. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct.Science. 1996; 272:1791–1794.Google Scholar
- 2.Jeffers MS, Karthikeyan S, Gomez-Smith M, Gasinzigwa S, Achenbach J, Feiten A, . Does stroke rehabilitation really matter? Part B: an algorithm for prescribing an effective intensity of rehabilitation.Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2018; 32:73–83. doi: 10.1177/1545968317753074Google Scholar
- 3.Veerbeek JM, Langbroek-Amersfoort AC, van Wegen EE, Meskers CG, Kwakkel G. Effects of robot-assisted therapy for the upper limb after stroke.Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017; 31:107–121. doi: 10.1177/1545968316666957Google Scholar
- 4.Reisman DS, McLean H, Keller J, Danks KA, Bastian AJ. Repeated split-belt treadmill training improves poststroke step length asymmetry.Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013; 27:460–468. doi: 10.1177/1545968312474118Google Scholar
- 5.Bishop L, Khan M, Martelli D, Quinn L, Stein J, Agrawal S. Exploration of two training paradigms using forced induced weight shifting with the tethered pelvic assist device to reduce asymmetry in individuals after stroke: case reports.Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017; 96(10 suppl 1):S135–S140. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000779Google Scholar
- 6.Cassidy JM, Tran G, Quinlan EB, Cramer SC. Neuroimaging identifies patients most likely to respond to a restorative stroke therapy.Stroke. 2018; 49:433–438. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.018844Google Scholar
- 7.Chang WH, Kim YH. Robot-assisted therapy in stroke rehabilitation.J Stroke. 2013; 15:174–181. doi: 10.5853/jos.2013.15.3.174Google Scholar
- 8.Dobkin BH, Dorsch A. The promise of mHealth: daily activity monitoring and outcome assessments by wearable sensors.Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011; 25:788–798. doi: 10.1177/1545968311425908Google Scholar
Getting Involved in Research With Stroke Rehabilitation Technologies | Stroke
TBI Rehabilitation 