Abstract
Background. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) paired with rehabilitation may improve upper-limb impairment and function after ischemic stroke.
Objective. To report 1-year safety, feasibility, adherence, and outcome data from a home exercise program paired with VNS using long-term follow-up data from a randomized double-blind study of rehabilitation therapy paired with Active VNS (n = 8) or Control VNS (n = 9).
Methods. All people were implanted with a VNS device and underwent 6 weeks in clinic therapy with Control or Active VNS followed by home exercises through day 90. Thereafter, participants and investigators were unblinded. The Control VNS group then received 6 weeks in-clinic Active VNS (Cross-VNS group). All participants then performed an individualized home exercise program with self-administered Active VNS. Data from this phase are reported here. Outcome measures were Fugl-Meyer Assessment—Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), Wolf Motor Function Test (Functional and Time), Box and Block Test, Nine-Hole Peg Test, Stroke Impact Scale, and Motor Activity Log.
Results. There were no VNS treatment–related serious adverse events during the long-term therapy. Two participants discontinued prior to receiving the full crossover VNS. On average, participants performed 200 ± 63 home therapy sessions, representing device use on 57.4% of home exercise days available for each participant. Pooled analysis revealed that 1 year after randomization, the FMA-UE score increased by 9.2 points (95% CI = 4.7 to 13.7; P = .001; n = 15). Other functional measures were also improved at 1 year.
Conclusions. VNS combined with rehabilitation is feasible, with good long-term adherence, and may improve arm function after ischemic stroke.
References
| 1. | Crichton, SL, Bray, BD, McKevitt, C, Rudd, AG, Wolfe, CDA. Patient outcomes up to 15 years after stroke: survival, disability, quality of life, cognition and mental health. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87:1091-1098. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline |
| 2. | Krishnamurthi, RV, Feigin, VL, Forouzanfar, MH, et al. Global and regional burden of first-ever ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke during 1990-2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet Glob Health. 2013;1:e259-e281. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI |
| 3. | Kwakkel, G, Veerbeek, JM, van Wegen, EEH, Wolf, SL. Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14:224-234. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI |
| 4. | Ward, NS, Brander, F, Kelly, K. Intensive upper limb neurorehabilitation in chronic stroke: outcomes from the Queen Square programme. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019;90:498-506. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline |
| 5. | Kwakkel, G, Kollen, B. Predicting improvement in the upper paretic limb after stroke: a longitudinal prospective study. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2007;25:453-460. Google Scholar | Medline | ISI |
| 6. | Ward, NS. Restoring brain function after stroke—bridging the gap between animals and humans. Nat Rev Neurol. 2017;13:244-255. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI |
| 7. | Nudo, RJ. Recovery after brain injury: mechanisms and principles. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:887. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI |
| 8. | Ward, NS, Cohen, LG. Mechanisms underlying recovery of motor function after stroke. Arch Neurol. 2004;61:1844-1848. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline |
| 9. | Taub, E, Uswatte, G, Elbert, T. New treatments in neurorehabiliation founded on basic research. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3:228-236. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI |
| 10. | Engineer, ND, Kimberley, TJ, Prudente, CN, Dawson, J, Tarver, WB, Hays, SA. Targeted vagus nerve stimulation for rehabilitation after stroke. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:280. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline |
| 11. | Hays, SA, Rennaker, RL, Kilgard, MP. Targeting plasticity with vagus nerve stimulation to treat neurological disease. Prog Brain Res. 2013;207:275-299. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI |
| 12. | Porter, BA, Khodaparast, N, Fayyaz, T, et al. Repeatedly pairing vagus nerve stimulation with a movement reorganizes primary motor cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2012;22:2365-2374. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI |
| 13. | Khodaparast, N, Hays, SA, Sloan, AM, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation delivered during motor rehabilitation improves recovery in a rat model of stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014;28:698-706. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 14. | Meyers, EC, Solorzano, BR, James, J, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation enhances stable plasticity and generalization of stroke recovery. Stroke. 2018;49:710-717. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline |
| 15. | Dawson, J, Pierce, D, Dixit, A, et al. Safety, feasibility, and efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation paired with upper-limb rehabilitation after ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2016;47:143-150. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline |
| 16. | Kimberley, TJ, Pierce, D, Prudente, CN, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation paired with upper limb rehabilitation after chronic stroke. Stroke. 2018;49:2789-2792. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.022279 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline |
| 17. | Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Physical Performance . Paper presented at: APTA Combined Sections Meeting; February 6-9, 2008; Nashville, TN. Google Scholar |
| 18. | Hodics, TM, Nakatsuka, K, Upreti, B, Alex, A, Smith, PS, Pezzullo, JC. Wolf Motor Function Test for characterizing moderate to severe hemiparesis in stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:1963-1967. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2012.05.002 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI |
| 19. | Mathiowetz, V, Volland, G, Kashman, N, Weber, K. Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther. 1985;39:386-391. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI |
| 20. | Chen, HM, Chen, CC, Hsueh, IP, Huang, SL, Hsieh, CL. Test-retest reproducibility and smallest real difference of 5 hand function tests in patients with stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23:435-440. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 21. | Duncan, PW, Bode, RK, Lai, SM, Perera, S; Glycine Antagonist in Neuroprotection Americans Investigators . Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the Stroke Impact Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:950-963. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI |
| 22. | Taub, E, McCulloch, K, Uswatte, G, Morris, DM. Motor Activity Log (MAL) Manual. https://www.uab.edu/citherapy/images/pdf_files/CIT_Training_MAL_manual.pdf. Accessed April 23, 2020. Google Scholar |
| 23. | Page, SJ, Fulk, GD, Boyne, P. Clinically important differences for the upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer scale in people with minimal to moderate impairment due to chronic stroke. Phys Ther. 2012;92:791-798. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI |
| 24. | Ben-Menachem, E. Vagus nerve stimulation, side effects, and long-term safety. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2001;18:415-418. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline |
| 25. | Lo, AC, Guarino, PD, Richards, LG, et al. Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1772-1783. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI |
| 26. | Wu, X, Guarino, P, Lo, AC, Peduzzi, P, Wininger, M. Long-term effectiveness of intensive therapy in chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016;30:583-590. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 27. | van der Lee, JH, Wagenaar, RC, Lankhorst, GJ, Vogelaar, TW, Devillé, WL, Bouter, LM. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke. 1999;30:2369-2375. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI |
| 28. | Levy, RM, Harvey, RL, Kissela, BM, et al. Epidural electrical stimulation for stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016;30:107-119. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 29. | Rodgers, H, Bosomworth, H, Krebs, HI, et al. Robot assisted training for the upper limb after stroke (RATULS): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;394:51-62. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline |
| 30. | Cramer, SC, Dodakian, L, Le, V, et al. Efficacy of home-based telerehabilitation vs in-clinic therapy for adults after stroke. JAMA Neurol. 2019;76:1079-1087. Google Scholar | Crossref |
| 31. | Nicolson, PJA, Hinman, RS, Wrigley, TV, Stratford, PW, Bennell, KL. Self-reported home exercise adherence: a validity and reliability study using concealed accelerometers. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018;48:943-950. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline |
| 32. | Burke, E, Cramer, SC. Biomarkers and predictors of restorative therapy effects after stroke. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2013;13:329. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI |
| 33. | Wu, J, Quinlan, EB, Dodakian, L, et al. Connectivity measures are robust biomarkers of cortical function and plasticity after stroke. Brain. 2015;138:2359-2369. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI |
| 34. | Khodaparast, N, Kilgard, MP, Casavant, R, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation during rehabilitative training improves forelimb recovery after chronic ischemic stroke in rats. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016;30:676-684. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 35. | Linder, SM, Rosenfeldt, AB, Reiss, A, et al. The home stroke rehabilitation and monitoring system trial: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Stroke. 2013;8:46-53. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 36. | Dickie, DA, Kimberley, TJ, Pierce, D, Engineer, N, Tarver, WB, Dawson, J. An exploratory study of predictors of response to vagus nerve stimulation paired with upper-limb rehabilitation after ischemic stroke. Sci Rep. 2019;9:15902. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline |
| 37. | Kimberley, TJ, Prudente, CN, Engineer, ND, et al. Study protocol for a pivotal randomised study assessing vagus nerve stimulation during rehabilitation for improved upper limb motor function after stroke. Eur Stroke J. 2019;4:363-377. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |