TBI Rehabilitation

[Abstract + References] A Novel Wearable Device for Motor Recovery of Hand Function in Chronic Stroke Survivors

Abstract

Background. In monkey, reticulospinal connections to hand and forearm muscles are spontaneously strengthened following corticospinal lesions, likely contributing to recovery of function. In healthy humans, pairing auditory clicks with electrical stimulation of a muscle induces plastic changes in motor pathways (probably including the reticulospinal tract), with features reminiscent of spike-timing dependent plasticity. In this study, we tested whether pairing clicks with muscle stimulation could improve hand function in chronic stroke survivors. 

Methods. Clicks were delivered via a miniature earpiece; transcutaneous electrical stimuli at motor threshold targeted forearm extensor muscles. A wearable electronic device (WD) allowed patients to receive stimulation at home while performing normal daily activities. A total of 95 patients >6 months poststroke were randomized to 3 groups: WD with shock paired 12 ms before click; WD with clicks and shocks delivered independently; standard care. Those allocated to the device used it for at least 4 h/d, every day for 4 weeks. Upper-limb function was assessed at baseline and weeks 2, 4, and 8 using the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), which has 4 subdomains (Grasp, Grip, Pinch, and Gross). 

Results. Severity across the 3 groups was comparable at baseline. Only the paired stimulation group showed significant improvement in total ARAT (median baseline: 7.5; week 8: 11.5; P = .019) and the Grasp subscore (median baseline: 1; week 8: 4; P = .004). 

Conclusion. A wearable device delivering paired clicks and shocks over 4 weeks can produce a small but significant improvement in upper-limb function in stroke survivors.

References

1.Kamalakannan, S, Gudlavalleti, AS, Gudlavalleti, VSM, Goenka, S, Kuper, H. Incidence & prevalence of stroke in India: a systematic review. Indian J Med Res. 2017;146:175-185.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
2.Kwakkel, G, Kollen, BJ, Wagenaar, RC. Therapy impact on functional recovery in stroke rehabilitation: a critical review of the literature. Physiotherapy. 1999;85:377-391.
Google Scholar | Crossref
3.Morris, JH, van Wijck, F, Joice, S, Donaghy, M. Predicting health related quality of life 6 months after stroke: the role of anxiety and upper limb dysfunction. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35:291-299.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
4.Kamalakannan, S, Venkata, MG, Prost, A, et al. Rehabilitation needs of stroke survivors after discharge from hospital in India. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97:1526-1532.e9.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
5.Rodgers, H, Shaw, L, Cant, R, et al. Evaluating an extended rehabilitation service for stroke patients (EXTRAS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2015;16:205.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
6.McKevitt, C, Fudge, N, Redfern, J, Sheldenkar, A, Crichton, S, Wolfe, C. The Stroke Association: UK Stroke Survivor Needs Survey. London, England: Stroke Association; 2010.
Google Scholar
7.Baker, SN. The primate reticulospinal tract, hand function and functional recovery. J Physiol. 2011;589(pt 23):5603-5612.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
8.Baker, SN, Zaaimi, B, Fisher, KM, Edgley, SA, Soteropoulos, DS. Pathways mediating functional recovery. Prog Brain Res. 2015;218:389-412.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
9.Choudhury, S, Shobhana, A, Singh, R, et al. The relationship between enhanced reticulospinal outflow and upper limb function in chronic stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2019;33:375-383.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
10.Zaaimi, B, Edgley, SA, Soteropoulos, DS, Baker, SN. Changes in descending motor pathway connectivity after corticospinal tract lesion in macaque monkey. Brain. 2012;135(pt 7):2277-2289.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
11.McPherson, JG, Chen, A, Ellis, MD, Yao, J, Heckman, CJ, Dewald, JPA. Progressive recruitment of contralesional cortico-reticulospinal pathways drives motor impairment post stroke. J Physiol. 2018;596:1211-1225.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
12.Fisher, KM, Zaaimi, B, Baker, SN. Reticular formation responses to magnetic brain stimulation of primary motor cortex. J Physiol. 2012;590(pt 16):4045-4060.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
13.Foysal, KR, de Carvalho, F, Baker, SN. Spike timing-dependent plasticity in the long-latency stretch reflex following paired stimulation from a wearable electronic device. J Neurosci. 2016;36:10823-10830.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
14.Bi, G, Poo, M. Synaptic modification by correlated activity: Hebb’s postulate revisited. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:139-166.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
15.McDonnell, M. Action Research Arm Test. Aust J Physiother. 2008;54:220.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
16.Pandyan, A, Johnson, G, Price, C, Curless, R, Barnes, M, Rodgers, H. A review of the properties and limitations of the Ashworth and modified Ashworth scales as measures of spasticity. Clin Rehabil. 1999;13:373-383.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
17.Foysal, KHMR, De Carvalho, F, Baker, SN. Spike-timing dependent plasticity in the long latency stretch reflex following paired stimulation from a wearable electronic device. J Neurosci. 2016;36:10823-10830.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
18.de Kroon, J, van der Lee, J, Ijzerman, MJ, Lankhorst, G. Therapeutic electrical stimulation to improve motor |control and functional abilities of the upper extremity after stroke: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2002;16:350-360.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
19.Chae, J, Sheffler, L, Knutson, J. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for motor restoration in hemiplegia. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2008;15:412-426.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
20.Takeda, K, Tanino, G, Miyasaka, H. Review of devices used in neuromuscular electrical stimulation for stroke rehabilitation. Med Devices (Auckl). 2017;10:207-213.
Google Scholar | Medline
21.Shindo, K, Fujiwara, T, Hara, J, et al. Effectiveness of hybrid assistive neuromuscular dynamic stimulation therapy in patients with subacute stroke: a randomized controlled pilot trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25:830-837.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
22.Alon, G, Levitt, AF, McCarthy, PA. Functional electrical stimulation enhancement of upper extremity functional recovery during stroke rehabilitation: a pilot study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21:207-215.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
23.Powell, J, Pandyan, AD, Granat, M, Cameron, M, Stott, DJ. Electrical stimulation of wrist extensors in poststroke hemiplegia. Stroke. 1999;30:1384-1389.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
24.Chae, J, Bethoux, F, Bohinc, T, Dobos, L, Davis, T, Friedl, A. Neuromuscular stimulation for upper extremity motor and functional recovery in acute hemiplegia. Stroke. 1998;29:975-979.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
25.Rosengren, S, Welgampola, M, Colebatch, J. Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: past, present and future. Clin Neurophysiol. 2010;121:636-651.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
26.Mainka, S, Wissel, J, Völler, H, Evers, S. The use of rhythmic auditory stimulation to optimize treadmill training for stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Front Neurol. 2018;9:755.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
27.Lee, S, Lee, K, Song, C. Gait training with bilateral rhythmic auditory stimulation in stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Brain Sci. 2018;8:E164.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
28.Mulavara, AP, Kofman, IS, De Dios, YE, et al. Using low levels of stochastic vestibular stimulation to improve locomotor stability. Front Syst Neurosci. 2015;9:117.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
29.Fitzpatrick, RC, Wardman, DL, Taylor, JL. Effects of galvanic vestibular stimulation during human walking. J Physiol. 1999;517:931-939.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
30.Suh, JH, Han, SJ, Jeon, SY, et al. Effect of rhythmic auditory stimulation on gait and balance in hemiplegic stroke patients. NeuroRehabilitation. 2014;34:193-199.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
31.Johansson, BB. Multisensory stimulation in stroke rehabilitation. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012;6:60.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
32.Zaaimi, B, Soteropoulos, DS, Fisher, KM, Riddle, CN, Baker, SN. Classification of neurons in the primate reticular formation and changes after recovery from pyramidal tract lesion. J Neurosci. 2018;38:6190-6206.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
33.Van der Lee, JH, De Groot, V, Beckerman, H, Wagenaar, RC, Lankhorst, GJ, Bouter, LM. The intra-and interrater reliability of the Action Research Arm Test: a practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:14-19.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
34.Bunday, KL, Urbin, MA, Perez, MA. Potentiating paired corticospinal-motoneuronal plasticity after spinal cord injury. Brain Stimul. 2018;11:1083-1092.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
35.Foysal, KMR, Baker, SN. A hierarchy of corticospinal plasticity in human hand and forearm muscles. J Physiol. 2019;597:2729-2739.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
36.Sangari, S, Lundell, H, Kirshblum, S, Perez, MA. Residual descending motor pathways influence spasticity after spinal cord injury. Ann Neurol. 2019;86:28-41.
Google Scholar | Medline
37.Sangari, S, Perez, MA. Imbalanced corticospinal and reticulospinal contributions to spasticity in humans with spinal cord injury. J Neurosci. 2019;86:28-41.
Google Scholar
38.Brown, P. Pathophysiology of spasticity. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994;57:773-777.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
39.Xu, J, Ejaz, N, Hertler, B, et al. Separable systems for recovery of finger strength and control after stroke. J Neurophysiol. 2017;118:1151-1163.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
40.Glover, IS, Baker, SN. Cortical, corticospinal and reticulospinal contributions to strength training. Journal of Neuroscience (in press).
Google Scholar
41.Sakai, ST, Davidson, AG, Buford, JA. Reticulospinal neurons in the pontomedullary reticular formation of the monkey (Macaca fascicularis). Neuroscience. 2009;163:1158-1170.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
42.Fregosi, M, Contestabile, A, Hamadjida, A, Rouiller, EM. Corticobulbar projections from distinct motor cortical areas to the reticular formation in macaque monkeys. Eur J Neurosci. 2017;45:1379-1395.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
43.Ballermann, M, Fouad, K. Spontaneous locomotor recovery in spinal cord injured rats is accompanied by anatomical plasticity of reticulospinal fibers. Eur J Neurosci. 2006;23:1988-1996.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
44.Karbasforoushan, H, Cohen-Adad, J, Dewald, JPA. Brainstem and spinal cord MRI identifies altered sensorimotor pathways post-stroke. Nat Commun. 2019;10:3524.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
45.Zaaimi, B, Dean, LR, Baker, SN. Different contributions of primary motor cortex, reticular formation and spinal cord to fractionated muscle activation. J Neurophysiol. 2018;119:235-250.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
46.Tazoe, T, Perez, MA. Cortical and reticular contributions to human precision and power grip. J Physiol. 2017;595:2715-2730.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
47.Kamper, DG, Harvey, RL, Suresh, S, Rymer, WZ. Relative contributions of neural mechanisms versus muscle mechanics in promoting finger extension deficits following stroke. Muscle Nerve. 2003;28:309-318.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
48.Ward, NS, Brander, F, Kelly, K. Intensive upper limb neurorehabilitation in chronic stroke: outcomes from the Queen Square programme. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019;90:498-506.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
49.Zeiler, SR, Hubbard, R, Gibson, EM, et al. Paradoxical motor recovery from a first stroke after induction of a second stroke: reopening a postischemic sensitive period. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016;30:794-800.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI

Source: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1545968320926162?journalCode=nnrb