TBI Rehabilitation

[Abstract + References] Predictors of Arm Nonuse in Chronic Stroke: A Preliminary Investigation

Abstract

Background. Nonuse (NU) after stroke is characterized by failure to use the contralesional arm despite adequate capacity. It has been suggested that NU is a consequence of the greater effort and/or attention required to use the affected limb, but such accounts have not been directly tested, and we have poor understanding of the predictors of NU. 

Objective. We aimed to provide preliminary evidence regarding demographic, neuropsychological (ie, apraxia, attention/arousal, neglect), and psychological (ie, self-efficacy) factors that may influence NU in chronic stroke. 

Methods. Twenty chronic stroke survivors with mild to moderate sensory-motor impairment characterized by the Upper-Extremity Fugl-Meyer (UEFM) were assessed for NU with a modified version of the Actual Amount of Use Test (AAUT), which measures the disparity between amount of use in spontaneous versus forced conditions. Participants were also assessed with measures of limb apraxia, spatial neglect, attention/arousal, and self-efficacy. Using stepwise multiple regression, we determined which variables predicted AAUT NU scores. 

Results. Scores on the UEFM as well as attention/arousal predicted the degree of NU (P < .05). Attention/arousal predicted NU above and beyond UEFM (P < .05). 

Conclusions. The results are consistent with the importance of attention and engagement necessary to fully incorporate the paretic limb into daily activities. Larger-scale studies that include additional behavioral (eg, sensation, proprioception, spasticity, pain, mental health, motivation) and neuroanatomical measures (eg, lesion volume and white matter connectivity) will be important for future investigations.

References

1.Raghavan, P. Upper limb motor impairment after stroke. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2015;26:599-610. doi:10.1016/j.pmr.2015.06.008
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
2.Taub, E, Uswatte, G, Mark, VW, Morris, DM. The learned nonuse phenonmenon: implications for rehabilitation. Eura Medicophys. 2006;42:241-256.
Google Scholar | Medline
3.Wolf, SL. Revisiting constraint-induced movement therapy: are we too smitten with the mitten? Is all nonuse “learned?” and other quandaries. Phys Ther. 2007;87:1212-1223. doi:10.2522/ptj.20060355
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
4.Waddell, KJ, Strube, MJ, Bailey, RR, et al. Does task-specific training improve upper limb performance in daily life poststroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017;31:290-300. doi:10.1177/1545968316680493
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
5.Young, NL, Williams, JI, Yoshida, KK, Bombardier, C, Wright, JG. The context of measuring disability: does it matter whether capability or performance is measured? J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49:1097-1101. doi:10.1016/0895-4356(96)00214-4
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
6.Bailey, RR, Klaesner, JW, Lang, CE. Quantifying real-world upper-limb activity in nondisabled adults and adults with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015;29:969-978. doi:10.1177/1545968315583720
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
7.Bakhti, KKA, Mottet, D, Schweighofer, N, Froger, J, Laffont, I. Proximal arm non-use when reaching after a stroke. Neurosci Lett. 2017;657:91-96. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2017.07.055
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
8.Stewart, JC, Cramer, SC. Patient-reported measures provide unique insights into motor function after stroke. Stroke. 2013;44:1111-1116. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.674671
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
9.van der Lee, JH, Wagenaar, RC, Lankhorst, GJ, Vogelaar, TW, Deville, WL, Bouter, LM. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke. 1999;30:2369-2375.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
10.Wolf, SL, Winstein, CJ, Miller, JP, et al. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2006;296:2095-2104. doi:10.1001/jama.296.17.2095
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
11.Sterr, A, Elbert, T, Berthold, I, Koölbel, S, Rockstroh, B, Taub, E. Longer versus shorter daily constraint-induced movement therapy of chronic hemiparesis: an exploratory study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:1374-1377. doi:10.1053/apmr.2002.35108
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
12.Park, J, Lee, N, Cho, Y, Yang, Y. Modified constraint-induced movement therapy for clients with chronic stroke: interrupted time series (ITS) design. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27:963-966. doi:10.1589/jpts.27.963
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
13.Takebayashi, T, Koyama, T, Amano, S, et al. A 6-month follow-up after constraint-induced movement therapy with and without transfer package for patients with hemiparesis after stroke: a pilot quasi-randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2013;27:418-426. doi:10.1177/0269215512460779
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
14.Ballester, BR, Maier, M, San Segundo Mozo, RM, Castada, V, Duff, A, Verschure, PFMJ. Counteracting learned non-use in chronic stroke patients with reinforcement-induced movement therapy. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016;13:74. doi:10.1186/s12984-016-0178-x
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
15.Liu, XH, Huai, J, Gao, J, Zhang, Y, Yue, SW. Constraint-induced movement therapy in treatment of acute and sub-acute stroke: a meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials. Neural Regen Res. 2017;12:1443-1450. doi:10.4103/1673-5374.215255
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
16.Taub, E, Uswatte, G, Pidikiti, R. Constraint-induced movement therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation—a clinical review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1999;36:237-251.
Google Scholar | Medline
17.Sunderland, A, Tuke, A. Neuroplasticity, learning and recovery after stroke: a critical evaluation of constraint-induced therapy. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2005;15:81-96. doi:10.1080/09602010443000047
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
18.Wulf, G, Lewthwaite, R. Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: the OPTIMAL theory of motor learning. Psychon Bull Rev. 2016;23:1382-1414. doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0999-9
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
19.Taub, E, Uswatte, G, Mark, VW, et al. Method for enhancing real-world use of a more affected arm in chronic stroke: transfer package of constraint-induced movement therapy. Stroke. 2013;44:1383-1388. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000559
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
20.Gauthier, LV, Taub, E, Perkins, C, Ortmann, M, Mark, VW, Uswatte, G. Remodeling the brain: plastic structural brain changes produced by different motor therapies after stroke. Stroke. 2008;39:1520-1525. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.502229
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
21.Katz, N, Hartman-Maeir, A, Ring, H, Soroker, N. Functional disability and rehabilitation outcome in right hemisphere damaged patients with and without unilateral spatial neglect. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:379-384.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
22.van Dalen, JW, van Charante, EPM, Nederkoorn, PJ, van Gool, WA, Richard, E. Poststroke apathy. Stroke. 2013;44:851-860. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.674614
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
23.Sundet, K, Finset, A, Reinvang, I. Neuropsychological predictors in stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1988;10:363-379. doi:10.1080/01688638808408245
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
24.Chen, S, Lewthwaite, R, Schweighofer, N, Winstein, CJ. Discriminant validity of a new measure of self-efficacy for reaching movements after stroke-induced hemiparesis. J Hand Ther. 2013;26:116-123. doi:10.1016/j.jht.2012.09.002
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
25.Sugg, K, Müller, S, Winstein, C, Hathorn, D, Dempsey, A. Does action observation training with immediate physical practice improve hemiparetic upper-limb function in chronic stroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015;29:807-817. doi:10.1177/1545968314565512
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
26.Stewart, JC, Lewthwaite, R, Rocktashel, J, Winstein, CJ. Self-efficacy and reach performance in individuals with mild motor impairment due to stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2019;33:319-328. doi:10.1177/1545968319836231
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
27.Schwartz, MF, Brecher, AR, Whyte, J, Klein, MG. A patient registry for cognitive rehabilitation research: a strategy for balancing patients’ privacy rights with researchers’ need for access. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:1807-1814. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.009
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
28.Woytowicz, EJ, Westlake, KP, Whitall, J, Sainburg, RL. Handedness results from complementary hemispheric dominance, not global hemispheric dominance: evidence from mechanically coupled bilateral movements. J Neurophysiol. 2018;120:729-740. doi:10.1152/jn.00878.2017
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
29.Woodbury, ML, Velozo, CA, Richards, LG, Duncan, PW. Rasch analysis staging methodology to classify upper extremity movement impairment after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:1527-1533. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2013.03.007
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
30.Buxbaum, LJ, Kyle, KM, Menon, R. On beyond mirror neurons: internal representations subserving imitation and recognition of skilled object-related actions in humans. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005;25:226-239. doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.05.014
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
31.Buxbaum, LJ, Shapiro, AD, Coslett, HB. Critical brain regions for tool-related and imitative actions: a componential analysis. Brain. 2014;137(pt 7):1971-1985. doi:10.1093/brain/awu111
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
32.Altman, DG. Statistics in medical journals: developments in the 1980s. Stat Med. 1991;10:1897-1913. doi:10.1002/sim.4780101206
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
33.Van Vleet, TM, DeGutis, JM. The nonspatial side of spatial neglect and related approaches to treatment. Prog Brain Res. 2013;207:327-349. doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-63327-9.00012-6
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
34.Buxbaum, LJ, Dawson, AM, Linsley, D. Reliability and validity of the Virtual Reality Lateralized Attention Test in assessing hemispatial neglect in right-hemisphere stroke. Neuropsychology. 2012;26:430-441. doi:10.1037/a0028674
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
35.Taub, E, DeLuca, S, Crago, JE. Actual Amount of Use Test. Unpublished Manuscript. Birmingham, AL: Psychology Department, University of Alabama, 1996.
Google Scholar
36.Kunkel, A, Kopp, B, Müller, G, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:624-628. doi:10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90163-6
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
37.Uswatte, G, Taub, E. Constraint-induced movement therapy: new approaches to outcome measurement in rehabilitation. In: Stuss, DT, Winocur, G, Robertson, IH, eds. Cognitive Neurorehabilitation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1999:215-229.
Google Scholar
38.Sterr, A, Freivogel, S, Schmalohr, D. Neurobehavioral aspects of recovery: assessment of the learned nonuse phenomenon in hemiparetic adolescents. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:1726-1731.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
39.Woytowicz, EJ, Rietschel, JC, Goodman, RN, et al. Determining levels of upper extremity movement impairment by applying a cluster analysis to the Fugl-Meyer assessment of the upper extremity in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98:456-462. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2016.06.023
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
40.Kutner, MH, Nachtsheim, CJ, Neter, J, Li, W. Applied Linear Statistical Models. 5th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2005.
Google Scholar
41.Schweighofer, N, Han, CE, Wolf, SL, Arbib, MA, Winstein, CJ. A functional threshold for long-term use of hand and arm function can be determined: predictions from a computational model and supporting data from the Extremity Constraint-Induced Therapy Evaluation (EXCITE) Trial. Phys Ther. 2009;89:1327-1336. doi:10.2522/ptj.20080402
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
42.Rafiei, MH, Kelly, KM, Borstad, AL, Adeli, H, Gauthier, LV. Predicting improved daily use of the more affected arm poststroke following constraint-induced movement therapy. Phys Ther. 2019;99:1667-1678. doi:10.1093/ptj/pzz121
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
43.Moruzzi, G, Magoun, HW. Brain stem reticular formation and activation of the EEG. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1949;1:455-473.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
44.Malik, PRA, Muir, RT, Black, SE, et al. Subcortical brain involvement is associated with impaired performance on the psychomotor vigilance task after minor stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2018;32:999-1007. doi:10.1177/1545968318804415
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
45.Boukrina, O, Barrett, AM. Disruption of the ascending arousal system and cortical attention networks in post-stroke delirium and spatial neglect. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017;83:1-10. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.09.024
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
46.Heilman, KM, Van Den Abell, T. Right hemisphere dominance for attention: the mechanism underlying hemispheric asymmetries of inattention (neglect). Neurology. 1980;30:327-330. doi:10.1212/wnl.30.3.327
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
47.van Kessel, ME, van Nes, IJW, Brouwer, WH, Geurts, ACH, Fasotti, L. Visuospatial asymmetry and non-spatial attention in subacute stroke patients with and without neglect. Cortex. 2010;46:602-612. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2009.06.004
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
48.Rinne, P, Hassan, M, Fernandes, C, et al. Motor dexterity and strength depend upon integrity of the attention-control system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;115:E536-E545. doi:10.1073/pnas.1715617115
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
49.Mathôt, S, Siebold, A, Donk, M, Vitu, F. Large pupils predict goal-driven eye movements. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015;144:513-521. doi:10.1037/a0039168
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
50.Dimenichi, BC, Richmond, LL. Reflecting on past failures leads to increased perseverance and sustained attention. J Cogn Psychol. 2015;27:180-193. doi:10.1080/20445911.2014.995104
Google Scholar | Crossref
51.Kalia, V, Thomas, R, Osowski, K, Drew, A. Staying alert? Neural correlates of the association between Grit and Attention Networks. Front Psychol. 2018;9:1377. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01377
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
52.Park, JS, Lee, G, Choi, JB, Hwang, NK, Jung, YJ. Game-based hand resistance exercise versus traditional manual hand exercises for improving hand strength, motor function, and compliance in stroke patients: a multi-center randomized controlled study. NeuroRehabilitation. 2019;45:221-227. doi:10.3233/nre-192829
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
53.Ward, NS, Brander, F, Kelly, K. Intensive upper limb neurorehabilitation in chronic stroke: outcomes from the Queen Square programme. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019;90:498-506. doi:10.1136/jnnp-2018-319954
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
54.Lewthwaite, R, Winstein, CJ, Lane, CJ, et al. Accelerating stroke recovery: body structures and functions, activities, participation, and quality of life outcomes from a large rehabilitation trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2018;32:150-165. doi:10.1177/1545968318760726
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
55.Kobylańska, M, Kowalska, J, Neustein, J, et al. The role of biopsychosocial factors in the rehabilitation process of individuals with a stroke. Work. 2019;61:523-535. doi:10.3233/WOR-162823
Google Scholar | Crossref
56.Sit, JWH, Chair, SY, Choi, KC, et al. Do empowered stroke patients perform better at self-management and functional recovery after a stroke? A randomized controlled trial. Clin Interv Aging. 2016;11:1441-1450. doi:10.2147/CIA.S109560
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
57.Marks, R, Allegrante, JP, Lorig, K. A review and synthesis of research evidence for self-efficacy-enhancing interventions for reducing chronic disability: implications for health education practice (part II). Health Promot Pract. 2005;6:148-156. doi:10.1177/1524839904266792
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
58.Winstein, C, Lewthwaite, R, Blanton, SR, Wolf, LB, Wishart, L. Infusing motor learning research into neurorehabilitation practice: a historical perspective with case exemplar from the accelerated skill acquisition program. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2014;38:190-200. doi:10.1097/NPT.0000000000000046
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
59.Winstein, C, Kim, B, Kim, S, Martinez, C, Schweighofer, N. Dosage matters. Stroke. 2019;50:1831-1837. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023603
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
60.Dušica, SP, Devečerski, GV, Jovićević, MN, Platiša, NM. Stroke rehabilitation: which factors influence the outcome? Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2015;18:484-487. doi:10.4103/0972-2327.165480
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
61.Hadidi, N, Treat-Jacobson, DJ, Lindquist, R. Poststroke depression and functional outcome: a critical review of literature. Heart Lung. 2009;38:151-162. doi:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2008.05.002
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
62.Winstein, C, Varghese, R. Been there, done that, so what’s next for arm and hand rehabilitation in stroke? NeuroRehabilitation. 2018;43:3-18. doi:10.3233/NRE-172412
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline

Source: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1545968320913554?journalCode=nnrb