[Abstract + References] Cognitive training in an everyday-like virtual reality enhances visual-spatial memory capacities in stroke survivors with visual field defects

ABSTRACT

Objectives

Visual field defects due to hemi- or quadrantanopia after stroke represent an under-recognized neurological symptom with inefficient instruments for neurorehabilitation to date. We here examined the effects of training in a virtual reality (VR) supermarket on cognitive functions, depressive symptoms, and subjective cognitive complaints in patients with hemianopia/quadrantanopia and healthy controls.

Methods

During a 14-day rehabilitation program, 20 patients and 20 healthy controls accomplished a real-life-like shopping task in a VR supermarket. A comparison between pre- and post-training standard neuropsychological measures, depressive symptoms, and subjective memory complaints allowed us to assess a putative transfer of rehabilitation effects from the training tasks to specific cognitive functions.

Results

The results indicate that VR training may improve performance not only in the trained task but also in specific neuropsychological functions. After the training, both patients and controls showed improved performances in visual scanning, mental rotation, visuoconstruction, and cognitive flexibility. Moreover, depressive symptoms were attenuated in both groups. In the patient group compared to the control group, the training particularly resulted in improved visual memory retrieval and reduced memory complaints.

Conclusions

The results of the current study suggest that VR training can improve particularly visual-spatial skills in patients with hemianopia or quadrantanopia. Our study thus introduces an interesting novel treatment approach to improve cognitive functions relevant to daily life in stroke patients with visual field defects

References

1. TaoW-D, LiuM, FisherM, WangD-R, LiJ, FurieKL. u. a. Posterior versus anterior circulation infarction: how different are the neurological deficits? Stroke . 2012 August 1;43(8):2060–2065. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.652420. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
2. SearlsDE, PazderaL, KorbelE, VysataO, CaplanLR. Symptoms and signs of posterior circulation Ischemia in the New England medical center posterior circulation registry. Arch Neurol . 2012 März 12;69(3):346–351. doi:10.1001/archneurol.2011.2083. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
3. GrayCS, FrenchJM, BatesD, CartlidgeNEF, VenablesGS, JamesOFW . Recovery of visual fields in acute stroke: homonymous Hemianopia associated with adverse prognosis. Age Ageing . 1989 November 1;18(6):419–421. doi:10.1093/ageing/18.6.419. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
4. de JongD, Kaufmann-EzraS, MeichtryJR, von ArxS, CazzoliD, GutbrodK . u. a. The influence of reading direction on hemianopic reading disorders. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol . 2016;38(10):1077–1083. doi:10.1080/13803395.2016.1189884. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
5. ParkerWT, McGwinGJr, WoodJM, ElginJ, VaphiadesMS, KlineLB . u. a. Self-reported driving difficulty by persons with hemianopia and quadrantanopia. Curr Eye Res . 2011;36(3):270–277. doi:10.3109/02713683.2010.548893. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
6. McGwin Jr.GJr, WoodJ, HuisinghC, OwsleyC . Motor vehicle collision involvement among persons with hemianopia and quadrantanopia. Geriatrics . 2016;1(3):19. doi:10.3390/geriatrics1030019. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Google Scholar]
7. WarrenM . Pilot study on activities of daily living limitations in adults with hemianopsia. Am J Occup Ther . 2009;63(5):626–633. doi:10.5014/ajot.63.5.626. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
8. HepworthLR, RoweFJ . Visual impairment following stroke-the impact on quality of life: a systematic review. Ophthalmol Res Int J . 2016:1–15. [Google Scholar]
9. SandKM, WilhelmsenG, NaessH, MidelfartA, ThomassenL, HoffJM . Vision problems in ischaemic stroke patients: effects on life quality and disability. Eur J Neurol . 2016;23:1–7. doi:10.1111/ene.2016.23.issue-S1. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
10. PowersWJ, RabinsteinAA, AckersonT, AdeoyeOM, BambakidisNC, BeckerK . u. a. 2018 Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American heart association/American stroke association. Stroke . 2018;49(3):e46–99. doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000158. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
11. SommerCJ, SchäbitzW-R . Fostering poststroke recovery: towards combination treatments. Stroke . 2017;48(4):1112–1119. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013324. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
12. BowersAR, KeeneyK, PeliE . Randomized crossover clinical trial of real and sham peripheral prism glasses for hemianopia. JAMA Ophthalmol . 2014 Februar 1;132(2):214–222. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.5636. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
13. RoweFJ, ConroyEJ, BedsonE, CwiklinskiE, DrummondA, García‐FiñanaM . u. a. A pilot randomized controlled trial comparing effectiveness of prism glasses, visual search training and standard care in hemianopia. Acta Neurol Scand . 2017 Oktober 1;136(4):310–321. doi:10.1111/ane.12725. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
14. de HaanGA, Melis-DankersBJM, BrouwerWH, TuchaO, HeutinkJ . The effects of compensatory scanning training on mobility in patients with homonymous visual field defects: a randomized controlled trial. Plos One . 2015 August 14;10(8):e0134459. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0134459. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
15. LaverKE, LangeB, GeorgeS, DeutschJE, SaposnikG, CrottyM . Virtual reality for stroke rehabili-tation. Stroke . 2018;49(4):e160–1. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.020275. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
16. AminovA, RogersJM, MiddletonS, CaeyenberghsK, WilsonPH . What do randomized controlled trials say about virtual rehabilitation in stroke? A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of upper-limb and cognitive outcomes. J Neuroeng Rehabil . 2018;15(1):29. doi:10.1186/s12984-018-0370-2. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Google Scholar]
17. LarøIF, CanlaireJ, MouradH. Van Der LindenM . Relations between a computerized shopping task and cognitive tests in a group of persons diagnosed with schizophrenia compared with healthy controls. J Int Neuropsychol Soc . 2010 Januar;16(01):180. doi:10.1017/S1355617709991159. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Google Scholar]
18. RempferMV, HameraEK, BrownCE, CromwellRL . The relations between cognition and the independent living skill of shopping in people with schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res . 2003 Februar;117(2):103–112. doi:10.1016/S0165-1781(02)00318-9. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
19. SanganiS, FungJ, KizonyR, KoenigST, WeissPL Navigating and shopping in a complex virtual urban mall to evaluate cognitive functions. In: 2013 International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation (ICVR). Philadelphia, PA, USA: IEEE; 2013:9–14. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
20. GreweP, KohsikA, FlentgeD, DyckE, BotschM, WinterY . u. a. Learning real-life cognitive abilities in a novel 360°-virtual reality supermarket: a neuropsychological study of healthy participants and patients with epilepsy. J Neuroeng Rehabil . 2013;10:42. doi:10.1186/1743-0003-10-42. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
21. DyckE, ZellE, KohsikA, GreweP, WinterY, PiefkeM , u. a. OCTAVIS: an easy-to-use VR-system for clinical studies. In: BenderJ, KuijperA, FellnerDW, GuérinE, Herausgeber , eds. Workshop on Virtual Reality Interaction and Physical Stimulation (VRIPHYS). The Eurographics Association, Darmstadt, Germany; 2012:127–136. [Google Scholar]
22. MeyersJE, MeyersKR . Rey Complex Figure Test and Recognition Trial Professional Manual . Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1995. [Google Scholar]
23. TaylorLB . Localisation of cerebral lesions by psychological testing. Neurosurgery . 1969;16(CN_suppl_1):269–287. doi:10.1093/neurosurgery/16.CN_suppl_1.269. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
24. ZimmermannP, FimmB . A test battery for attentional performance. In: LeclercqM, ZimmermannP , eds. Applied Neuropsychology of Attention . London: Psychology Press; 2002:110–151. [Google Scholar]
25. HärtingC, MarkowitschHJ, NeufeldH, CalabreseP, DeisingerK, KesslerJ . Wechsler Gedächtnis Test-Revidierte Fassung (WMS-R) . Bern: Huber; 2000. [Google Scholar]
26. SchelligD . Block-Tapping-Test (BTT) . FrankfurtMain: Swets Test Syst; 1997. [Google Scholar]
27. AschenbrennerS, TuchaO, LangeKW . Regensburger Wortflüssigkeits-Test: RWT . Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2000. [Google Scholar]
28. OfteSH, HugdahlK . Right-left discrimination in male and female, young and old subjects. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol . 2002;24(1):82–92. doi:10.1076/jcen.24.1.82.966. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
29. GreweP, OhmannHA, MarkowitschHJ, PiefkeM . The Bergen left–right discrimination test: practice effects, reliable change indices, and strategic performance in the standard and alternate form with inverted stimuli. Cogn Process . 2014;15(2):159–172. doi:10.1007/s10339-013-0587-8. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
30. CrookTH, FeherEP, LarrabeeGJ . Assessment of memory complaint in age-associated memory impairment: the MAC-Q. Int Psychogeriatr . 1992;4(2):165–176. doi:10.1017/S1041610292000991. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Google Scholar]
31. HautzingerM, KellerF, KühnerC . Beck Depressions-inventar (BDI-II) . Frankfurt Maindelis: Harcourt Test Services; 2006. [Google Scholar]
32. FieldA . Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics . Los Angeles, CA: Sage; 2013. [Google Scholar]
33. FergusonCJ . An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. Prof Psychol Res Pract . 2009;40(5):532–538.doi:10.1037/a0015808. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
34. ZihlJ . Visual scanning behavior in patients with homonymous hemianopia. Neuropsychologia . 1995;33(3):287–303. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(94)00119-A. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
35. ZihlJ, Von CramonD . Visual field recovery from scotoma in patients with postgeniculate damage: review of 55 cases. Brain . 1985 Juni 1;108(2):335–365. doi:10.1093/brain/108.2.335. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Google Scholar]
36. NellesG, EsserJ, EcksteinA, TiedeA, GerhardH, DienerHC . Compensatory visual field training for patients with hemianopia after stroke. Neurosci Lett . 2001;306(3):189–192. doi:10.1016/S0304-3940(01)01907-3. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
37. BologniniN, RasiF, CocciaM, LàdavasE . Visual search improvement in hemianopic patients after audio-visual stimulation. Brain . 2005;128(12):2830–2842. doi:10.1093/brain/awh656. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Google Scholar]
38. PambakianALM, MannanSK, HodgsonTL, KennardC . Saccadic visual search training: a treatment for patients with homonymous hemianopia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry . 2004 Oktober 1;75(10):1443–1448. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2003.025957. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
39. JordanK, WüstenbergT, Jaspers-FeyerF, FellbrichA, PetersM . Sex differences in left/right confusion. Cortex . 2006;42(1):69–78. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70323-X. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
40. OcklenburgS, HirnsteinM, OhmannHA, HausmannM . Mental rotation does not account for sex differences in left–right confusion. Brain Cogn . 2011;76(1):166–171. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2011.01.010. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
41. GormleyGJ, DempsterM, BestR . Right-left discrimination among medical students: questionnaire and psychometric study. BMJ . 2008;337:a2826. doi:10.1136/bmj.a2826. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Google Scholar]
42. WaiJ, LubinskiD, BenbowCP . Spatial ability for STEM domains: aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. J Educ Psychol . 2009;101(4):817–835. doi:10.1037/a0016127. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
43. ColucciaE, LouseG . Gender differences in spatial orientation: A review. J Environ Psychol . 2004;24(3):329–340.doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.08.006. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
44. MastersMS, SandersB . Is the gender difference in mental rotation disappearing? Behav Genet . 1993;23(4):337–341. doi:10.1007/BF01067434. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]

Source: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10749357.2020.1716531?scroll=top&needAccess=true