A paper recently published in the Journal of Neurophysiology provides another example. It features a case of delayed partial recovery from weakness and paralysis produced by a devastating stroke, with improvements in hand function more than two decades after the initial event (Sörös et al. 2017).

 

WHAT DID THEY FIND?

In 1979, when the patient was 15 years old, his cervical rib compressed his subclavian artery, such that thrombosis formed back to the innominate artery. Emboli subsequently entered the carotid and vertebrobasilar circulations. A dense left hemiplegia developed with a large right frontoparietal infarction.

No detail of any initial rehabilitation is given but partial use of the left shoulder and elbow, along with the left leg had been regained about 4 months after the stroke. However, minimal recovery occurred in the left hand: it was spastic and useless for 23 years.

When the patient began regular swimming in 2001, he noted finger movements of his left hand. In 2009, he began extra physiotherapy using a spring-loaded orthosis for his left hand. Currently, the patient can use his left hand to pick up small objects like coins.

Functional MR imaging was performed when the second period of recovery had occurred. When the patient repeatedly opened and closed his left hand there was extensive activation in both hemispheres and bilaterally in the cerebellum. In contrast, movements of comparable size and rate made by the unaffected hand (i.e., the right hand) produced only focal activity in the contralateral sensorimotor cortex, supplementary motor area and cerebellum.

 

SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPLICATIONS

While the case features a rare complication of the thoracic outlet syndrome produced by a cervical rib, it highlights spectacularly the capacity of cortical and cerebellar circuits to be reformed or reactivated in such a way that new functional movements can occur at the distal extremity, i.e. the hand. It is not possible to determine whether the swimming and later rehabilitation caused or even contributed to the surprising improvement. It may have occurred spontaneously.  Nonetheless, the case has important messages for rehabilitation of stroke, especially in young people.  The traditional view in rehabilitation following stroke is that most of the functional improvement occurs within the first 12-18 months.  One widely promoted view is that the initial motor recovery occurs to a fixed proportion of the initial severity of the deficit (70% of recovery occurs in the first three months) (Prabhakaran et al. 2008; Smith et al. 2017).  This case of prolonged paralysis with delayed recovery after a severe ischaemic stroke means that the therapeutic window for improvement can be much longer than traditionally thought.  By implication, many new therapies (potentially cellular, pharmacological or physical ones) could be tested long after stroke.

 

PUBLICATION

Sörös P, Teasell R, Hanley DF, Spence JD. Motor recovery beginning 23 years after ischemic stroke. J Neurophysiol 118: 778-781, 2017.

 

KEY REFERENCES

Brodal A. Self-observations and neuro-anatomical considerations after a stroke. Brain 96: 675-694, 1973.

Prabhakaran S, Zarahn E, Riley C, Speizer A, Chong JY, Lazar RM, Marshall RS, and Krakauer JW. Inter-individual variability in the capacity for motor recovery after ischemic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 22: 64-71, 2008.

Smith MC, Byblow WD, Barber PA, and Stinear CM. Proportional recovery from lower limb motor impairment after stroke. Stroke 48: 1400-1403, 2017.

 

AUTHOR BIO

Simon Gandevia is an NHMRC Senior Principal Research Fellow and Deputy Director of Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA). His research investigates the sensorimotor control of human movements. He has special interests in proprioception, muscle, breathing control, and fatigue.  He is Chief investigator of the NHMRC Program grant at NeuRA on Motor Impairment. You can learn more about Simon and his research here. You can also follow him on Twitter @SimonGandevia and @MotorImpairment.