Posts Tagged Barriers

[ARTICLE] Barriers, Facilitators and Interventions to Support Virtual Reality Implementation in Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review – Full Text

Abstract

Virtual reality and active video games (VR/AVGs) are promising rehabilitation tools because of their potential to facilitate abundant, motivating, and feedback-rich practice. However, clinical adoption remains low despite a growing evidence base and the recent development of clinically accessible and rehabilitation-specific VR/AVG systems. Given clinicians’ eagerness for resources to support VR/AVG use, a critical need exists for knowledge translation (KT) interventions to facilitate VR/AVG integration into clinical practice. KT interventions have the potential to support adoption by targeting known barriers to, and facilitators of, change. This scoping review of the VR/AVG literature uses the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to (1) structure an overview of known barriers and facilitators to clinical uptake of VR/AVGs for rehabilitation; (2) identify KT strategies to target these factors to facilitate adoption; and (3) report the results of these strategies. Barriers/facilitators and evaluated or proposed KT interventions spanned all but 1 and 2 TDF domains, respectively. Most frequently cited barriers/facilitators were found in the TDF domains of Knowledge, Skills, Beliefs About Capabilities, Beliefs About Consequences, Intentions, Goals, Environmental Context and Resources, and Social Influences. Few studies empirically evaluated KT interventions to support adoption; measured change in VR/AVG use did not accompany improvements in self-reported skills, attitudes, and knowledge. Recommendations to target frequently identified barriers include technology development to meet end-user needs more effectively, competency development for end-users, and facilitated VR/AVG implementation in clinical settings. Subsequent research can address knowledge gaps in both clinical and VR/AVG implementation research, including on KT intervention effectiveness and unexamined TDF domain barriers.

Introduction

Virtual reality and active video games (VR/AVG) are promising rehabilitation tools because of their potential to facilitate abundant, motivating, and feedback-rich practice [,]. A steady increase in the number of peer-reviewed articles evaluating the effects of VR/AVG interventions in many rehabilitation populations has been observed over the past 20 years. This increase reflects a growing interest in VR/AVG from the rehabilitation research and development sectors. Ideally, newly developed and empirically evaluated products and interventions that are found to be safe and effective would be quickly integrated into clinical practice. Yet what we are observing in patient care follows a more typical pattern for the adoption of evidence-based treatment techniques or tools: one of slow and variable progress [].

Collaboration between engineers and product end-users can inform the development of useful VR/AVG technologies that meet the needs of clients and therapists. Moving VR/AVG technology into the hands of therapists allows clients to benefit from its therapeutic potential. Systematically examining the factors that impact VR/AVG adoption in rehabilitation, and the effect of knowledge translation (KT) strategies on behaviors related to their use, is critical for guiding the successful implementation of these technologies. A clear understanding of how VR/AVG is being used by clinicians, the limitations clinicians face in integrating the technologies into their daily treatment routines, and the most effective strategies for supporting clinicians in technology adoption are paramount to informing these implementation approaches.

Recent surveys of occupational and physical therapists in Canada [], the United States (Levac et al., in preparation), and Scotland [] on their use of VR/AVG and their learning needs related to future use of these technologies provides a foundational knowledge base about current clinical use. Nearly half of the 1071 respondents in Canada [] and 76% of the 491 U.S. respondents (Levac et al., in preparation) had used VR/AVG clinically. However, only 12% of respondents in Canada [], 31% in the United States (Levac et al., in preparation), and 18% of the 112 respondents in Scotland [] reported current use. This discrepancy indicates the need for additional efforts to identify and to address existing barriers to VR/AVG use. Commercially available AVG systems were the most common systems in use in all 3 countries [,] (Levac et al., in preparation); the use of rehabilitation-specific VR systems by Canadian [] and U.S. therapists (Levac et al., in preparation) was much lower (<3% of respondents for any given system).

Despite low reported daily use, VR/AVG systems were perceived by therapists to be widely relevant to rehabilitation for a number of different client populations, functional recovery goals and practice settings []. Sixty-one percent of respondents in Scotland reported that they would use gaming if it were available to them []. The majority of respondents in both Canada [] (76.3%) and the United States (69.9%) (Levac et al., in preparation) reported low self-efficacy in using VR/AVG clinically, but were interested in learning more. Commonly reported learning needs included knowledge and skills in selecting appropriate systems and games for individual clients, grading activities, evaluating outcomes, and integrating theoretical approaches to treatment [,,]. These findings suggest a strong need for educational resources and knowledge translation (KT) supports to facilitate evidence-based technology adoption [,]. KT is the process of moving evidence into practice []. KT interventions have the potential to support adoption by targeting known barriers to change, including a lack of knowledge and skills [].

Strong insights into the factors influencing therapists’ adoption of VR/AVG have emerged only in the past 5 years. A decomposed Theory of Planned Behavior, which integrates constructs from the Technology Adoption Model and the Diffusion of Innovation theory forms the theoretical basis for the majority of this research [,]. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) is another approach that can be used to conceptualize the evaluation of barriers and facilitators of change, including technology adoption []. The TDF is an implementation framework that integrates 128 theoretical constructs drawn from 33 behavior change theories into 14 barrier/facilitator domains []. Although the framework has not been applied yet to this body of literature, it offers a more comprehensive approach to the identification and classification of barriers and facilitators of change than a single theory or framework alone. Drawn from the KT literature, the framework can be used to structure the assessment of barriers and facilitators of change across a range of contexts, as well as the selection of interventions to target these barriers and facilitators [].

The purpose of this scoping review was to apply the TDF to examine the extent, range, and nature of studies assessing VR/AVG barriers and facilitators and/or recommending or evaluating KT interventions to promote VR/AVG adoption in rehabilitation since 2005. Our objectives were to

  1. present an overview of factors known to limit or support VR/AVG adoption for rehabilitation;

  2. describe the KT strategies that have been recommended or evaluated to address these factors and to report on their effectiveness, where possible; and

  3. provide recommendations for technology development, research, and clinical implementation based on these findings.

[…]

Continue —>  Barriers, Facilitators and Interventions to Support Virtual Reality Implementation in Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review

, , , , , , , ,

Leave a comment

[Abstract] Acceptance of Tele-Rehabilitation by Stroke Patients: Perceived Barriers and Facilitators

Abstract

Objective

To explore the perceived barriers and facilitators of tele-rehabilitation (TR) by stroke patients, caregivers and rehabilitation therapists in an Asian setting.

Design

Qualitative study involving semi-structured in-depth interviews and focus group discussions.

Setting

General community.

Participants

Participants (N=37) including stroke patients, their caregivers, and tele-therapists selected by purposive sampling.

Interventions

Singapore Tele-technology Aided Rehabilitation in Stroke trial.

Main Outcome Measures

Perceived barriers and facilitators for TR uptake, as reported by patients, their caregivers, and tele-therapists.

Results

Thematic analysis was used to inductively identify the following themes: facilitators identified by patients were affordability and accessibility; by tele-therapists, was filling a service gap and common to both was unexpected benefits such as detection of uncontrolled hypertension. Barriers identified by patients were equipment setup–related difficulties and limited scope of exercises; barriers identified by tele-therapists were patient assessments, interface problems and limited scope of exercises; and common to both were connectivity barriers. Patient characteristics like age, stroke severity, caregiver support, and cultural influence modified patient perceptions and choice of rehabilitation.

Conclusions

Patient attributes and context are significant determinants in adoption and compliance of stroke patients to technology driven interventions like TR. Policy recommendations from our work are inclusion of introductory videos in TR programs, provision of technical support to older patients, longer FaceTime sessions as re-enforcement for severely disabled stroke patients, and training of tele-therapists in assessment methods suitable for virtual platforms.

via Acceptance of Tele-Rehabilitation by Stroke Patients: Perceived Barriers and Facilitators – Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

, , , , , , ,

Leave a comment

[Abstract + References] Epilepsy, Physical Activity and Sports: A Narrative Review

Abstract

People with epilepsy (PWE) are less physically active compared with the general population. Explanations include prejudice, overprotection, unawareness, stigma, fear of seizure induction and lack of knowledge of health professionals. At present, there is no consensus on the role of exercise in epilepsy. This paper reviews the current evidence surrounding the risks and benefits associated with physical activity (PA) in this group of patients. In the last decade, several publications indicate significant benefits in physiological and psychological health parameters, including mood and cognition, physical conditioning, social interaction, quality of life, as well as potential prevention of seizure presentation. Moreover, experimental studies suggest that PA provides mechanisms of neuronal protection, related to biochemical and structural changes including release of β-endorphins and steroids, which may exert an inhibitory effect on the occurrence of abnormal electrical activity. Epileptic discharges can decrease or disappear during exercise, which may translate into reduced seizure recurrence. In some patients, exercise may precipitate seizures. Available evidence suggests that PA should be encouraged in PWE in order to promote wellbeing and quality of life. There is a need for prospective randomized controlled studies that provide stronger clinical evidence before definitive recommendations can be made.

References

1. World Health Organization. Epilepsy Fact sheet: Bulletin 999 2017 [cited 2017 December 5]. Available at:http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs999/en/.Google Scholar
2. RaiDKerrMPMcManusSJordanovaVLewisGBrughaTSEpilepsy and psychiatric comorbidity—a nationally representative population-based study: epilepsy and psychiatric morbidityEpilepsia2012;53(6):10951103.CrossRef | Google Scholar
3. AridaRMScorzaFACavalheiroEAPeruccaEMoshéSLCan people with epilepsy enjoy sports? Epilepsy Res.2012;98(1):9495.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
4. NakkenKOLøyningALøyningTGløersenGLarssonPGDoes physical exercise influence the occurrence of epileptiform EEG discharges in children? Epilepsia1997;38(3):279284.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
5. EomSLeeMKParkJ-Het alThe impact of an exercise therapy on psychosocial health of children with benign epilepsy: a pilot studyEpilepsy Behav2014;37:151156.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
6. AridaRMImpact of physical exercise therapy on behavioral and psychosocial aspects of epilepsyEpilepsy Behav.2014;40:9091.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
7. AridaRMScorzaFAda SilvaSGSchachterSCCavalheiroEAThe potential role of physical exercise in the treatment of epilepsyEpilepsy Behav2010;17(4):432435.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
8. CapovillaGKaufmanKRPeruccaEMoshéSLAridaRMEpilepsy, seizures, physical exercise, and sports: a report from the ILAE Task Force on sports and epilepsyEpilepsia2016;57(1):612.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
9. ElliottJOMooreJLLuBHealth status and behavioral risk factors among persons with epilepsy in Ohio based on the 2006 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance SystemEpilepsy Behav2008;12(3):434444.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
10. NakkenKOPhysical exercise in outpatients with epilepsyEpilepsia1999;40(5):643651.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
11. AblahEHaugAKondaKet alExercise and epilepsy: a survey of Midwest epilepsy patientsEpilepsy Behav.2009;14(1):162166.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
12. SteinhoffBJNeusüssKThegederHReimersCDLeisure time activity and physical fitness in patients with epilepsy.Epilepsia1996;37(12):12211227.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
13. AridaRMScorzaFAde AlbuquerqueMCysneirosRMde OliveiraRJCavalheiroEAEvaluation of physical exercise habits in Brazilian patients with epilepsyEpilepsy Behav2003;4(5):507510.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
14. HanKChoi-KwonSLeeS-KLeisure time physical activity in patients with epilepsy in Seoul, South KoreaEpilepsy Behav2011;20(2):321325.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
15. HinnellCWilliamsJMetcalfeAet alHealth status and health-related behaviors in epilepsy compared to other chronic conditions—a national population-based study: health status and behaviors in epilepsyEpilepsia2010;51(5):853861.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
16. CuiWZackMMKobauRHelmersSLHealth behaviors among people with epilepsy—results from the 2010 National Health Interview SurveyEpilepsy Behav2015;44:121126.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
17. WongJWirrellEPhysical activity in children/teens with epilepsy compared with that in their siblings without epilepsyEpilepsia2006;47(3):631639.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
18. SaengsuwanJBoonyaleepanSTiamkaoSDiet, exercise, sleep, sexual activity, and perceived stress in people with epilepsy in NE ThailandEpilepsy Behav2015;45:3943.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
19. ChongJKudrimotiHSLopezDCLabinerDMBehavioral risk factors among Arizonans with epilepsy: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2005/2006Epilepsy Behav2010;17(4):511519.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
20. JalavaMSillanpääMPhysical activity, health-related fitness, and health experience in adults with childhood-onset epilepsy: a controlled studyEpilepsia1997;38(4):424429.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
21. ElliottJOLuBMooreJLMcAuleyJWLongLExercise, diet, health behaviors, and risk factors among persons with epilepsy based on the California Health Interview Survey, 2005Epilepsy Behav2008;13(2):307315.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
22. GordonKEDooleyJMBrnaPMEpilepsy and activity—a population-based study: epilepsy and activityEpilepsia.2010;51(11):22542259.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
23. EppsSAKahnABHolmesPVBoss-WilliamsKAWeissJMWeinshenkerDAntidepressant and anticonvulsant effects of exercise in a rat model of epilepsy and depression comorbidityEpilepsy Behav2013;29(1):4752.CrossRef | Google Scholar
24. LernerJTSankarRMazaratiAMGalanin and epilepsyEXS2010;102:183194.Google Scholar | PubMed
25. BabyakMBlumenthalJAHermanSet alExercise treatment for major depression: maintenance of therapeutic benefit at 10 monthsPsychosom Med2000;62(5):633638.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
26. GuptaRAggarwalAExercise and rheumatoid arthritis: a low-cost intervention with major benefitsNatl Med J India.2015;28(3):132133.Google Scholar | PubMed
27. WestergrenTFegranLNilsenTHaraldstadKKittangOBBerntsenSActive play exercise intervention in children with asthma: a pilot studyBMJ Open2016;6(1):e009721.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
28. HaxhiJLetoGdi PalumboASet alExercise at lunchtime: effect on glycemic control and oxidative stress in middle-aged men with type 2 diabetesEur J Appl Physiol2016;116(3):573582.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
29. de LimaCde LiraCABAridaRMet alAssociation between leisure time, physical activity, and mood disorder levels in individuals with epilepsyEpilepsy Behav2013;28(1):4751.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
30. McAuleyJWLongLHeiseJet alA prospective evaluation of the effects of a 12-week outpatient exercise program on clinical and behavioral outcomes in patients with epilepsyEpilepsy Behav2001;2(6):592600.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
31. RothDLGoodeKTWilliamsVLFaughtEPhysical exercise, stressful life experience, and depression in adults with epilepsyEpilepsia1994;35(6):12481255.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
32. GötzeWKubickiSMunterMTeichmannJEffect of physical exercise on seizure threshold (investigated by electroencephalographic telemetry)Dis Nerv Syst1967;28(10):664667.Google Scholar
33. HorydWGryziakJNiedzielskaKZielińskiJJEffect of physical exertion on seizure discharges in the EEG of epilepsy patientsNeurol Neurochir Pol1981;15(5–6):545552.Google Scholar | PubMed
34. VanciniRLde LiraCABScorzaFAet alCardiorespiratory and electroencephalographic responses to exhaustive acute physical exercise in people with temporal lobe epilepsyEpilepsy Behav2010;19(3):504508.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
35. De LimaCVanciniRLAridaRMet alPhysiological and electroencephalographic responses to acute exhaustive physical exercise in people with juvenile myoclonic epilepsyEpilepsy Behav2011;22:718722.CrossRef | Google ScholarPubMed
36. Engel – YegerBZlotnikSShaharEChildhood-onset primary generalized epilepsy—impacts on children’s preferences for participation in out-of-school activitiesEpilepsy Behav2014;34(1):15.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
37. FerlisiMShorvonSSeizure precipitants (triggering factors) in patients with epilepsyEpilepsy Behav2014;33:101105.CrossRef | Google Scholar
38. CamfieldCCamfieldPInjuries from seizures are a serious, persistent problem in childhood onset epilepsy: a population-based studySeizure2015;27:8083.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
39. CollardSSMarlowCThe psychosocial impact of exercising with epilepsy: a narrative analysisEpilepsy Behav.2016;61:199205.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
40. BrnaPMGordonKEWoolridgeEDooleyJMWoodEPerceived need for restrictions on activity for children with epilepsyEpilepsy Behav2017;73:236239.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
41. AguirreCQuintasSRuiz-TorneroAMet alDo people with epilepsy have a different lifestyle? Epilepsy Behav.2017;74:2732.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
42. Almeida-Souza-TedrusGMStercaGSBuarquePRPhysical activity, stigma, and quality of life in patients with epilepsyEpilepsy Behav2017;77:9698.CrossRef | Google Scholar
43. HäfeleCAFreitasMPda SilvaMCRombaldiAJAre physical activity levels associated with better health outcomes in people with epilepsy? Epilepsy Behav2017;72:2834.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
44. CollardSSEllis- HillCHow do you exercise with epilepsy? Insights into the barriers and adaptations to successfully exercise with epilepsyEpilepsy Behav2017;70:6671.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
45. HäfeleCAFreitasMPGerviniBLde CarvalhoRMRombaldiAJWho are the individuals diagnosed with epilepsy using the Public Health System in the city of Pelotas, southern Brazil? Epilepsy Behav2018;78:8490.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
46. Ben-MenachemEWeight issues for people with epilepsy—a reviewEpilepsia2007;48:4245.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
47. HellierJLDudekFESpontaneous motor seizures of rats with kainate-induced epilepsy: effect of time of day and activity stateEpilepsy Res1999;35(1):4757.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
48. TutkunEAyyildizMAgarEShort-duration swimming exercise decreases penicillin-induced epileptiform EcoG activity in ratsActa Neurobiol Exp (Wars)2010;70(4):382389.Google Scholar | PubMed
49. KayacanYTutkunEArslanGAyyildizMAgarEThe effects of treadmill exercise on penicillin-induced epileptiform activityArch Med Sci2016;12(5):935940.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
50. RadakZChungHYGotoSSystemic adaptation to oxidative challenge induced by regular exerciseFree Radic Biol Med2008;44(2):153159.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
51. Peixinho-PenaLFFernandesJde AlmeidaAAet alA strength exercise program in rats with epilepsy is protective against seizuresEpilepsy Behav2012;25(3):323328.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
52. NybergJAbergMAITorenKNilssonMBen-MenachemEKuhnHGCardiovascular fitness and later risk of epilepsy: a Swedish population-based cohort studyNeurology2013;81(12):10511057.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
53. SetkowiczZMazurAPhysical training decreases susceptibility to subsequent pilocarpine-induced seizures in the rat.Epilepsy Res2006;71(2–3):142148.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
54. AridaRMScorzaFAdos SantosNFPeresCACavalheiroEAEffect of physical exercise on seizure occurrence in a model of temporal lobe epilepsy in ratsEpilepsy Res1999;37(1):4552.CrossRef | Google Scholar
55. ContetCGavériaux-RuffCMatifasACaradecCChampyM-FKiefferBLDissociation of analgesic and hormonal responses to forced swim stress using opioid receptor knockout miceNeuropsychopharmacology2006;31(8):17331744.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
56. AridaRMScorzaFAToscano-SilvaMCavalheiroEADoes exercise correct dysregulation of neurosteroid levels induced by epilepsy? Ann Neurol2010;68(6):971972.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
57. MevissenMEbertUAnticonvulsant effects of melatonin in amygdala-kindled ratsNeurosci Lett1998;257(1):1316.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
58. AridaRMScorzaCAScorzaFAGomes da SilvaSda Graça Naffah-MazzacorattiMCavalheiroEAEffects of different types of physical exercise on the staining of parvalbumin-positive neurons in the hippocampal formation of rats with epilepsyProg Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry2007;31(4):814822.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
59. AridaRMSanabriaERGda SilvaACFariaLCScorzaFACavalheiroEAPhysical training reverts hippocampal electrophysiological changes in rats submitted to the pilocarpine model of epilepsyPhysiol Behav2004;83(1):165171.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
60. AridaRMde Jesus VieiraACavalheiroEAEffect of physical exercise on kindling developmentEpilepsy Res.1998;30(2):127132.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
61. YonedaYKanmoriKIdaSKuriyamaKStress-induced alterations in metabolism of gamma-aminobutyric acid in rat brainJ Neurochem1983;40(2):350356.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
62. SouzaMAOliveiraMSFurianAFet alSwimming training prevents pentylenetetrazol-induced inhibition of Na+, K+-ATPase activity, seizures, and oxidative stressEpilepsia2009;50(4):811823.CrossRef | Google Scholar
63. BlackJEIsaacsKRAndersonBJAlcantaraAAGreenoughWTLearning causes synaptogenesis, whereas motor activity causes angiogenesis, in cerebellar cortex of adult ratsProc Natl Acad Sci USA1990;87(14):55685572.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
64. KleimJACooperNRVandenBergPMExercise induces angiogenesis but does not alter movement representations within rat motor cortexBrain Res2002;934(1):16.CrossRef | Google Scholar
65. NisticòGCirioloMRFiskinKIannoneMde MartinoARotilioGNGF restores decrease in catalase activity and increases superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase activity in the brain of aged ratsFree Radic Biol Med.1992;12(3):177181.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
66. CarroETrejoJLBusiguinaSTorres-AlemanICirculating insulin-like growth factor I mediates the protective effects of physical exercise against brain insults of different etiology and anatomyJ Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci2001;21(15):56785684.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
67. OgunyemiAOGomezMRKlassDWSeizures induced by exerciseNeurology1988;38(4):6336334.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
68. SimpsonRK JrGrossmanRGSeizures after joggingN Engl J Med1989;321(12):835.Google Scholar | PubMed
69. BjørholtPGNakkenKORøhmeKHansenHLeisure time habits and physical fitness in adults with epilepsy.Epilepsia1990;31(1):8387.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
70. SchmittBThun-HohensteinLVontobelHBoltshauserESeizures induced by physical exercise: report of two cases.Neuropediatrics1994;25(01):5153.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
71. EriksenHREllertsenBGrønningsaeterHNakkenKOLøyningYUrsinHPhysical exercise in women with intractable epilepsyEpilepsia1994;35(6):12561264.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
72. SturmJWFediMBerkovicSFReutensDCExercise-induced temporal lobe epilepsyNeurology2002;59(8):12461248.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
73. WerzMAIdiopathic generalized tonic–clonic seizures limited to exercise in a young adultEpilepsy Behav.2005;6(1):98101.CrossRef | Google Scholar
74. KamelJTBadawyRACookMJExercise-induced seizures and lateral asymmetry in patients with temporal lobe epilepsyEpilepsy Behav Case Rep2014;2:2630.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
75. BennettDRSports and epilepsy: to play or not to playSemin Neurol1981;1:345357.CrossRef | Google Scholar
76. AridaRMCavalheiroEAda SilvaACScorzaFAPhysical activity and epilepsy: proven and predicted benefitsSports Med Auckl NZ2008;38(7):607615.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
77. RodenburgRMeijerAMScherphofCet alParenting and restrictions in childhood epilepsyEpilepsy Behav.2013;27(3):497503.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
78. MecarelliOMessinaPCapovillaGet alAn educational campaign toward epilepsy among Italian primary school teachersEpilepsy Behav2014;32:8491.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
79. PainterERauschJRModiACChanges in daily activity patterns of caregivers of children with newly diagnosed epilepsy: a case-controlled designEpilepsy Behav2014;31:16.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
80. ILAE Commission ReportRestrictions for children with epilepsy. Commission of Pediatrics of the ILAE. International League Against EpilepsyEpilepsia1997;38(9):10541056.CrossRef | Google Scholar
81. KaufmanKRAnticonvulsants in sports: ethical considerationsEpilepsy Behav2007;10(2):268271.CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed

via Epilepsy, Physical Activity and Sports: A Narrative Review | Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences | Cambridge Core

 

, , , , , , ,

Leave a comment

[ARTICLE] Attitudes, barriers and enablers to physical activity in pregnant women: a systematic review – Full Text

Abstract

Question

What are the attitudes, barriers and enablers to physical activity perceived by pregnant women?

Design

In a systematic literature review, eight electronic databases were searched: AMED, CINAHL, Embase, Joanna Briggs Institute, Medline, PsycInfo, SPORTDiscus (from database inception until June 2016) and PubMed (from 2011 until June 2016). Quantitative data expressed as proportions were meta-analysed. Data collected using Likert scales were synthesised descriptively. Qualitative data were analysed thematically using an inductive approach and content analysis. Findings were categorised as intrapersonal, interpersonal or environmental, based on a social-ecological framework.

Participants

Pregnant women.

Intervention

Not applicable.

Outcome measures

Attitudes and perceived barriers and enablers to physical activity during pregnancy.

Results

Forty-nine articles reporting data from 47 studies (7655 participants) were included. Data were collected using questionnaires, interviews and focus groups. Meta-analyses of proportions showed that pregnant women had positive attitudes towards physical activity, identifying it as important (0.80, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.98), beneficial (0.71, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.83) and safe (0.86, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.92). This was supported by themes emerging in 15 qualitative studies that reported on attitudes (important, 12 studies; beneficial, 10 studies). Barriers to physical activity were predominantly intrapersonal such as fatigue, lack of time and pregnancy discomforts. Frequent enablers included maternal and foetal health benefits (intrapersonal), social support (interpersonal) and pregnancy-specific programs. Few environmental factors were identified. Little information was available about attitudes, barriers and enablers of physical activity for pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus who are at risk from inactivity.

Conclusion

Intrapersonal themes were the most frequently reported barriers and enablers to physical activity during pregnancy. Social support also played an enabling role. Person-centred strategies using behaviour change techniques should be used to address intrapersonal and social factors to translate pregnant women’s positive attitudes into increased physical activity participation.

Introduction

Physical activity has substantial benefits for women with uncomplicated pregnancies, minimal risks, and is recommended in pregnancy guidelines.1, 2, 3 The benefits of physical activity during pregnancy include improved physical fitness,3, 4, 5 reduced risk of excessive weight gain,6 reduced risk of pre-eclampsia and pre-term birth,7reduced low back pain,8, 9 improved sleep,10 reduced anxiety and depressive symptoms,11, 12 and improved health perception13 and self-reported body image.14

Physical activity is also important for pregnant women with comorbidities and complications such as obesity1 or gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).15, 16, 17 Physical activity assists with weight control and reduces the risk of GDM in obese pregnant women.1 In women diagnosed with GDM (a common pregnancy-related complication occurring in 3.5 to 12% of pregnancies),15, 16 physical activity is beneficial as an adjunctive intervention in the management of glycaemic control.15, 17, 18, 19, 20 Managing glycaemic control is critical for reducing adverse effects associated with poorly controlled GDM.21 Consequently, aerobic exercise performed at moderate intensity for 30 minutes on most days of the week is recommended for healthy pregnant women,1, 3 those with GDM15, 22,23 and those who are overweight or obese.24

Despite well-documented health benefits,1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 24, 25, 26, 27 60 to 80% of pregnant women28, 29, 30, 31 – including those who are overweight or obese31 – and more than 60% of women with GDM32 do not participate in physical activity as recommended. Pregnant women from backgrounds other than Caucasian are also less likely to engage in physical activity.29 However, to improve pregnant women’s participation in physical activity (ie, leisure time physical activities or structured exercise programs), we need to understand their attitudes to it, the reasons why they do not engage in physical activity, and enablers that could be harnessed to design effective physical activity interventions or programs that facilitate behaviour change and thereby improve their participation in physical activity during pregnancy.

The inclusion of behaviour change techniques into physical activity interventions has been reported as helpful in improving physical activity levels during pregnancy.33 Behaviour change techniques such as goal setting, planning and education to shape knowledge appear most effective when delivered with face-to-face feedback about goal achievement.33 However, to facilitate uptake of these effective physical activity interventions, clinicians need to know which barriers, enablers and attitudes are common among pregnant women, so they can effectively target their education and evidence-based behaviour change strategies. A systematic review of barriers, enablers and attitudes of pregnant women to physical activity would provide valuable information to enable clinicians to effect a positive behaviour change of increased physical activity in this group.

Identification of women’s attitudes and perceptions of barriers and enablers to physical activity in pregnancy could be informed by quantitative or qualitative research approaches. A review that collates data from studies using either method would benefit from the advantages of each: improving generalisability and providing deeper insights into pregnant women’s beliefs and perceptions about physical activity during pregnancy. Inclusion of qualitative findings may assist in better understanding the factors that can influence women’s attitudes and perceptions. Such deeper understanding would provide valuable insight that clinicians can use to plan strategies to encourage pregnant women – in particular at-risk groups of women such as those with GDM – to participate in physical activity. It would also inform the design of realistic and acceptable interventions to be tested in an effectiveness study. No systematic review has collated quantitative data or provided a meta-summary of attitudes and perceptions of barriers and enablers to physical activity in pregnant women.

Therefore, the research question for this review was:

What are the attitudes, barriers and enablers to physical activity perceived by pregnant women, including women diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus?

Continue —> Attitudes, barriers and enablers to physical activity in pregnant women: a systematic review – Journal of Physiotherapy

, , , , ,

Leave a comment

[Abstract] Enhancing clinical implementation of virtual reality

Abstract:

Despite an emerging evidence base and rapid increases in the development of clinically accessible virtual reality (VR) technologies for rehabilitation, clinical adoption remains low. This paper uses the Theoretical Domains Framework to structure an overview of the known barriers and facilitators to clinical uptake of VR and discusses knowledge translation strategies that have been identified or used to target these factors to facilitate adoption. Based on this discussion, we issue a ‘call to action’ to address identified gaps by providing actionable recommendations for development, research and clinical implementation.

Source: Enhancing clinical implementation of virtual reality – IEEE Xplore Document

, , , , , , , , ,

Leave a comment

[WEB SITE] Zero Project | For a world without barriers

 

Zero Project

Our mission is working for a world with zero barriers. Worldwide, the Zero Project finds and shares models that improve the daily lives and legal rights of all persons with disabilities. The focus of the year 2014 is accessibility.

via Zero Project | For a world without barriers.

, , ,

Leave a comment

%d bloggers like this: