Posts Tagged cognitive impairment

[Abstract + References] Effects of immersive and non-immersive virtual reality-based rehabilitation training on cognition, motor function, and daily functioning in patients with mild cognitive impairment or dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Objective

To examine the effectiveness of virtual reality (VR)-based rehabilitation training in improving cognition, motor function, and daily functioning in patients with mild cognitive impairment and dementia.

Data sources

A systematic review of published literature was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, Elsevier, Embase, Cochrane, CNKI, Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.

Methods

The search period was from inception to 7 October 2023. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of VR-based rehabilitation training in patients with mild cognitive impairment or dementia versus control subjects. Methodologic quality was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias tool, and outcomes were calculated as the standard mean difference between participant groups with 95% confidence interval.

Results

A total of 21 randomized controlled trials with 1138 patients were included. The meta-analysis showed that VR-based rehabilitation training had significant effects on Montreal Cognitive Assessment (SMD: 0.50; 95%CI: 0.05 to 0.95; P = 0.030), Trail-making test A (SMD: −0.38; 95%CI: −0.61 to −0.14; P = 0.002), and Berg Balance Scale scores (SMD: 0.79; 95%CI: 0.13 to 1.45; P = 0.020). A subgroup analysis revealed that the type of VR, and duration and frequency of interventions had statistically significant effects on cognition and motor function.

Conclusion

VR-based rehabilitation training is a beneficial nonpharmacologic approach for managing mild cognitive impairment or dementia. Immersive VR-based training had greater effects on cognition and motor function than non-immersive VR-based training, but non-immersive VR-based training was more convenient for patients with limitations imposed by their disease. Also, an intervention lasting 5–8 weeks and for >30 min at a frequency of ≥3 times/week achieved the best results. It indicated that a longer intervention cycle may not achieve the best intervention effect and training duration and schedule should be carefully considered when managing patients.

References

1. Aruanno B, Garzotto F. Memholo: mixed reality experiences for subjects with Alzheimer’s disease[J]. Multimed Tools Appl 2019; 78: 13517–13537.

Crossref

Google Scholar

2. Arvanitakis Z, Shah RC, Bennett DA. Diagnosis and management of dementia: review[J]. Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association 2019; 322: 1589–1599.

Crossref

PubMed

Google Scholar

3. Tangalos EG, Petersen RC. Mild cognitive impairment in geriatrics[J]. Clin Geriatr Med 2018; 34: 563.

Crossref

Google Scholar

4. Jack CR, Albert MS, Knopman DS, et al. Introduction to the recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease[J]. Alzheimers & Dementia 2011; 7: 257–262.

Crossref

PubMed

ISI

Google Scholar

5. Lehrner J, Moser D, Klug S, et al. Subjective memory complaints, depressive symptoms and cognition in patients attending a memory outpatient clinic[J]. Int Psychogeriatr 2014; 26: 463–473.

Crossref

PubMed

Google Scholar

6. Gaubert F, Borg C, Chainay H. Decision-making in Alzheimer’s disease: the role of working memory and executive functions in the Iowa gambling task and in tasks inspired by everyday situations[J]. Journal of Alzheimers Disease 2022; 90: 1793–1815.

Crossref

Google Scholar

7. Jarry C, Osiurak F, Baumard J, et al. Daily life activities in patients with Alzheimer’s disease or semantic dementia: Multitasking assessment[J]. Neuropsychologia 2021; 150: 107714.

Crossref

Google Scholar

8. Tieri G, Morone G, Paolucci S, et al. Virtual reality in cognitive and motor rehabilitation: facts, fiction and fallacies[J]. Expert Rev Med Devices 2018; 15: 107–117.

Crossref

PubMed

Google Scholar

9. Son C, Park J. Ecological effects of VR-based cognitive training on ADL and IADL in MCI and AD patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19: 1660–4601.

Crossref

Google Scholar

10. Garcia-Betances RI, Jimenez-Mixco V, Arredondo MT, et al. Using virtual reality for cognitive training of the elderly[J]. American Journal of Alzheimers Disease and Other Dementias 2015; 30: 49–54.

Crossref

PubMed

ISI

Google Scholar

11. Tuena C, Mancuso V, Stramba-Badiale C, et al. Egocentric and allocentric spatial memory in mild cognitive impairment with real-world and virtual navigation tasks: a systematic review[J]. Journal of Alzheimers Disease 2021; 79: 95–116.

Crossref

Google Scholar

12. Zhu S, Sui Y, Shen Y, et al. Effects of virtual reality intervention on cognition and motor function in older adults with mild cognitive impairment or dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Front Aging Neurosci 2021; 13: 586999.

Crossref

Google Scholar

13. Perra A, Riccardo CL, De Lorenzo V, et al. Fully immersive virtual reality-based cognitive remediation for adults with psychosocial disabilities: A systematic scoping review of methods intervention gaps and meta-analysis of published effectiveness studies[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2023; 20: 1527.

Crossref

Google Scholar

14. Smith CM, Read JE, Bennie C, et al. Can non-immersive virtual reality improve physical outcomes of rehabilitation?[J]. Phys Ther Rev 2013; 17: 1–15.

Crossref

Google Scholar

15. Panerai S, Catania V, Rundo F, et al. Functional living skills in patients with major neurocognitive disorder due to degenerative or non-degenerative conditions: Effectiveness of a non-immersive virtual reality training[J]. Sensors 2023; 23: 1896.

Crossref

Google Scholar

16. Li R, Zhang Y, Jiang Y, et al. Rehabilitation training based on virtual reality for patients with Parkinson’s disease in improving balance, quality of life, activities of daily living, and depressive symptoms: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis[J]. Clin Rehabil 2021; 35: 1089–1102.

Crossref

PubMed

ISI

Google Scholar

17. Ren Y, Lin C, Zhou Q, et al. Effectiveness of virtual reality games in improving physical function, balance and reducing falls in balance-impaired older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2023; 108: 104924.

Crossref

Google Scholar

18. Park JH. Does the virtual shopping training improve executive function and instrumental activities of daily living of patients with mild cognitive impairment?[J]. Asian J Psychiatry 2022; 69: 102977.

Crossref

Google Scholar

19. Moher DLAT. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement[J]. PLoS Med 2009; 339: 333–339.

Google Scholar

20. Park JH. Does the virtual shopping training improve executive function and instrumental activities of daily living of patients with mild cognitive impairment?[J]. Asian J Psychiatr 2022; 69: 102977.

Crossref

Google Scholar

21. Choi W, Lee S. The effects of virtual Kayak paddling exercise on postural balance, muscle performance, and cognitive function in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled trial[J]. J Aging Phys Act 2019; 27: 861–870.

Crossref

Google Scholar

22. Hagovska M, Olekszyova Z. Impact of the combination of cognitive and balance training on gait, fear and risk of falling and quality of life in seniors with mild cognitive impairment[J]. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2016; 16: 1043–1050.

Crossref

PubMed

Google Scholar

23. Hsieh CC, Lin PS, Hsu WC, et al. The effectiveness of a virtual reality-based tai chi exercise on cognitive and physical function in older adults with cognitive impairment[J]. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2018; 46: 358–370.

Crossref

PubMed

Google Scholar

24. Hughes TFTF, Flatt JDJD, Fu BB, et al. Interactive video gaming compared to health education in older adults with MCI: a feasibility study[J]. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2014; 29: 890–898.

Crossref

Google Scholar

25. Kang JM, Kim N, Lee SY, et al. Effect of cognitive training in fully immersive virtual reality on visuospatial function and frontal-occipital functional connectivity in predementia: randomized controlled trial[J]. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23: e24526.

Crossref

Google Scholar

26. Liao YY, Chen IH, Lin YJ, et al. Effects of virtual reality-based physical and cognitive training on executive function and dual-task gait performance in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a randomized control trial[J]. Front Aging Neurosci 2019; 11: 162.

Crossref

PubMed

Google Scholar

27. Liao YY, Tseng HY, Lin YJ, et al. Using virtual reality-based training to improve cognitive function, instrumental activities of daily living and neural efficiency in older adults with mild cognitive impairment[J]. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2020; 56: 47–57.

Crossref

PubMed

Google Scholar

28. Man DW, Chung JC, Lee GY. Evaluation of a virtual reality-based memory training programme for Hong Kong Chinese older adults with questionable dementia: a pilot study[J]. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2012; 27: 513–520.

Crossref

PubMed

Google Scholar

29. Mirelman A, Rochester L, Maidan I, et al. Addition of a non-immersive virtual reality component to treadmill training to reduce fall risk in older adults (V-TIME): a randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet 2016; 388: 1170–1182.

Crossref

PubMed

Google Scholar

30. Oliveira J, Gamito P, Souto T, et al. Virtual reality-based cognitive stimulation on people with mild to moderate dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: a pilot randomized controlled trial[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18: 1–13.

Crossref

Google Scholar

31. Padala KP, Padala PR, Malloy TR, et al. Wii-fit for improving gait and balance in an assisted living facility: a pilot study.[J]. J Aging Res 2012; 2012: 597573.

Crossref

Google Scholar

32. Padala KP, Padala PR, Lensing SY, et al. Home-Based exercise program improves balance and fear of falling in community-dwelling older adults with mild Alzheimer’s disease: a pilot study[J]. J Alzheimers Dis 2017; 59: 565–574.

Crossref

PubMed

Google Scholar

33. Park JH, Park JH. Does cognition-specific computer training have better clinical outcomes than non-specific computer training? A single-blind, randomized controlled trial[J]. Clin Rehabil 2018; 32: 213–222.

Crossref

PubMed

ISI

Google Scholar

34. Park J, Jung Y, Lee G. Virtual reality-based cognitive–motor rehabilitation in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled study on motivation and cognitive function[J]. Healthcare (Basel) 2020; 8: 335.

Crossref

Google Scholar

35. Park JH, Liao Y, Kim DR, et al. Feasibility and tolerability of a culture-based virtual reality (VR) training program in patients with mild cognitive impairment: A randomized controlled pilot study[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17: 3030.

Crossref

PubMed

Google Scholar

36. Schwenk M, Sabbagh M, Lin I, et al. Sensor-based balance training with motion feedback in people with mild cognitive impairment[J]. J Rehabil Res Dev 2016; 53: 945–958.

Crossref

PubMed

Google Scholar

37. Thapa N, Park HJ, Yang JG, et al. The effect of a virtual reality-based intervention program on cognition in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a randomized control trial[J]. J Clin Med 2020; 9: 1–11.

Crossref

Google Scholar

38. Uğur F, Sertel M. The effect of virtual reality applications on balance and gait speed in individuals with Alzheimer dementia: a pilot study[J]. Top Geriatr Rehabil 2020; 36: 221–229.

Crossref

Google Scholar

39. Yang J, Thapa N, Park H, et al. Virtual reality and exercise training enhance brain, cognitive, and physical health in older adults with mild cognitive impairment[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19: 13300.

Crossref

Google Scholar

40. Zhao Rongrong LGGC. Application of virtual reality technology in cognitive rehabilitation training in patients with mild cognitive impairment. [J]. Neural Injury Funct Reconstruct 2021; 10: 590–592.

Google Scholar

41. Tombaugh TN. Trail making test A and B: normative data stratified by age and education[J]. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2004; 19: 203–214.

Crossref

PubMed

ISI

Google Scholar

42. Kim O, Pang Y, Kim J. The effectiveness of virtual reality for people with mild cognitive impairment or dementia: a meta-analysis[J]. BMC Psychiatry 2019; 19: 219.

Crossref

Google Scholar

43. Maggio MG, Latella D, Maresca G, et al. Virtual reality and cognitive rehabilitation in people with stroke: an overview[J]. J Neurosci Nursing 2019; 51: 101–105.

Crossref

Google Scholar

44. Bourrelier J, Fautrelle L, Haratyk E, et al. Enhancement of anticipatory postural adjustments by virtual reality in older adults with cognitive and motor deficits: a randomised trial.[J]. Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) 2021; 6: 1–16.

Google Scholar

45. Barrett LF. The theory of constructed emotion: an active inference account of interoception and categorization[J]. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2017; 12: w154.

Crossref

Google Scholar

46. Slater M. Measuring presence: a response to the Witmer and Singer presence questionnaire[J]. Presence-Teleoperators Virtual Environ 1999; 8: 560–565.

Crossref

ISI

Google Scholar

47. Subramanian SK, Lourenco CB, Chilingaryan G, et al. Arm motor recovery using a virtual reality intervention in chronic stroke: randomized control trial[J]. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2013; 27: 13–23.

Crossref

PubMed

ISI

Google Scholar

48. De Luca R, Russo M, Naro A, et al. Effects of virtual reality-based training with BTs-nirvana on functional recovery in stroke patients: preliminary considerations[J]. Int J Neurosci 2018; 128: 791–796.

Crossref

PubMed

Google Scholar

49. Hao J, He Z, Yu X, et al. Comparison of immersive and non-immersive virtual reality for upper extremity functional recovery in patients with stroke: a systematic review and network meta-analysis[J]. Neurol Sci 2023; 27: 2101417.

Google Scholar

50. Clemente M, Rey B, Rodriguez-Pujadas A, et al. A functional magnetic resonance imaging assessment of small animals’ phobia using virtual reality as a stimulus[J]. JMIR Serious Games 2014; 2: e6.

Crossref

Google Scholar

51. Sokolov AA, Collignon A, Bieler-Aeschlimann M. Serious video games and virtual reality for prevention and neurorehabilitation of cognitive decline because of aging and neurodegeneration[J]. Curr Opin Neurol 2020; 33: 239–248.

Crossref

Google Scholar

52. Ge S, Zhu Z, Wu B, et al. Technology-based cognitive training and rehabilitation interventions for individuals with mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review[J]. BMC Geriatr 2018; 18: 213.

Crossref

PubMed

Google Scholar

53. Liu J, Zhong D, Chen L, et al. Effects of virtual reality cognitive training in individuals with mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2021; 36: 1829–1847.

Crossref

Google Scholar

Source

, , , , , , , ,

Leave a comment

[ARTICLE] Virtual reality technology in the rehabilitation of post-stroke cognitive impairment: an opinion article on recent findings – Full Text

Introduction

Post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) is a group of syndromes in which one or more cognitive dysfunctions, such as memory, executive function, orientation and attention, occur within 6 months after stroke (Lim et al., 2021). The prevalence of PSCI is as high as 64%, and 1/3 of these patients will progress to dementia, seriously affecting their quality of life (Delavaran et al., 2017). Post-stroke limb movement disorders have long received widespread attention and have a well-established clinical rehabilitation system (Nakawah and Lai, 2016). However, PSCI is often neglected.

Currently, oral medications and rehabilitation are the main treatment modalities for PSCI, but the therapeutic effects are not satisfactory. Animal models cannot reproduce several features of the pathogenesis of vascular cognitive impairment, which limits the development of relevant drugs (Kuang et al., 2021). To date, no drug for vascular cognitive impairment has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (USA) (Gorelick et al., 2011). Vascular dementia and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) overlap in their neuropathological mechanisms (Sun, 2018). Drugs for AD can also improve cognitive function and activities of daily living in patients with PSCI, such as donepezil, galantamine and memantine (Glass et al., 2020Cichon et al., 2021). However, the side effects and potential harms of long-term drug use need to be considered (Shetty, 2013). Cognitive impairment is mainly assessed with paper and pencil tests (De Roeck et al., 2019). The occupational therapist provides therapeutic or adaptive tasks depending on the patient’s cognitive status (Mijajlović et al., 2017). This type of training is tedious and the results vary widely in clinical practice. However, there is no clear treatment for PSCI (Rost and Brodtmann, 2022).

The effective integration of rehabilitation for cognitive impairment with computer technology has led to new and more interesting treatment modalities, such as virtual reality (VR) (Ge et al., 2018). VR is a new computer-generated technology that is being widely used clinically for the diagnosis, assessment, and treatment of mental disorders (Freeman et al., 2017). VR has two key features: immersion and interaction, providing a three-dimensional environment for the user to interact with the virtual environment through multiple sensory channels, including visual, auditory, and tactile (García-Betances et al., 2015). Previous studies have shown that cognitive training, physical training, and lifestyle can improve cognitive function (Stern, 2012Huang et al., 2017). Compared to traditional rehabilitation therapies, VR incorporates some game-like elements that increase participants’ motivation, cooperation, and satisfaction. VR can be designed with different scenarios and training to target different cognitive areas, and can be adapted in a timely manner according to patients’ needs and cognitive status. In addition, compared to traditional paper-and-pencil tests, VR-based goal-directed navigation and recognition tasks are performed by immersing patients in a 3D virtual environment (La Corte et al., 2019). VR navigation tasks may involve more complex processes, including representational updating, spatial memory, and adaptation of the self when approaching a distant spatial target (Brument et al., 2021). These skills and manipulations cannot be accounted for in paper-and-pencil tests.

VR technology has been initially demonstrated in the treatment of cognitive disorders, such as memory impairment, attention impairment, executive function, language and numeracy impairment (D’Cunha et al., 2019). Several studies have shown that VR technology improves visuospatial motion perception, delayed memory, orientation and attention better than traditional cognitive rehabilitation (Liao et al., 2020Torpil et al., 2021). Besides, a study by Liao et al. (2019) found significant improvements in self-care and gait in patients who underwent VR interventions (task-based interventions: simulated grocery store, simulated kitchen, finding a store, etc.). A meta-analysis found that VR was less effective in improving cognitive function in patients with AD than in normal elderly and people with MCI. However, the feasibility of VR technology has been demonstrated in a non-immersive VR intervention for patients with AD (Hofmann et al., 2003Kim et al., 2019). Notably, the effect of the intervention was correlated with patient cooperation. Impaired memory and executive function are key features of AD. Several studies have used VR tasks to intervene with AD patients for 2–4 months (Serino et al., 2017Oliveira et al., 2021). The results showed that the VR task was effective in improving patients’ overall cognitive function, memory and executive function, especially spatial navigation and memory.

At present, with the rise of virtual reality technology, VR technology has a good prospect of being applied to PSCI. PSCI seriously threatens patients’ quality of life, and VR technology has a potential role in rehabilitation. VR technology applied to the rehabilitation of PSCI not only allows patients to train in a safe and interesting environment, but also provides timely feedback on the effectiveness of treatment. This paper aims to outline the key role of VR technology in improving cognition in patients with PSCI. Moreover, the authors highlight the limitations and challenges of current research related to VR technologies for improving cognition in stroke patients. […]

Continue

, , , , ,

Leave a comment

[ARTICLE] Virtual Reality in the Rehabilitation of Cognitive Impairment after Stroke – Full Text PDF

Abstract

Virtual reality (VR) is seen by some as a tool that may greatly improve, or even revolutionize cognitive rehabilitation. VR offers distinct advantages compared to classic rehabilitation using paper-and-pencil or computer-based training, such as immersion, the feeling of presence, embodiment of virtual players, ecological and multisensory stimulation. We here review recent clinical studies examining the effects of VR training in patients with stroke-induced cognitive deficits. Several trials reported evidence that VR training improves general cognition compared to standard cognitive training. However, the evidence remains controversial, as some of these studies had a high risk of bias. Regarding mood, there is some indication that immersive training improves depression scores in stroke patients, but the number of studies examining mood changes is very low. Finally, in the domain of spatial cognition the development of specific intervention techniques such as virtual prism adaptation provide avenues for clinical interventions, though well-controlled clinical trials are lacking. Together, the available evidence suggests that VR has the potential to improve rehabilitation particularly in domains requiring repetitive training in an immersed, ecological setting, or when a mismatch between body frames and the environment is created. Controlled clinical studies are required to examine the specific advantages of VR compared to classic interventions.

Download full-text PDF

Read full-text

Source

, , , , , , ,

Leave a comment

[Abstract] The Impact of Cognitive Impairment on Robot-Based Upper-Limb Motor Assessment in Chronic Stroke

Abstract

Background

Chronic upper extremity motor deficits are present in up to 65% of stroke survivors, and cognitive impairment is prevalent in 46-61% of stroke survivors even 10 years after their stroke. Robot-assisted therapy programs tend to focus on motor recovery and do not include stroke patients with cognitive impairment.

Objective

This study aims to investigate performance on the individual cognitive domains evaluated in the MoCA and their relation to upper-limb motor performance on a robotic system.

Methods

Participants were recruited from the stroke population with a wide range of cognitive and motor levels to complete a trajectory tracking task using the Haptic TheraDrive rehabilitation robot system. Motor performance was evaluated against standard clinical cognitive and motor assessments. Our hypothesis is that the cognitive domains involved in the visuomotor tracking task are significant predictors of performance on the robot-based task and that impairment in these domains results in worse motor performance on the task compared to subjects with no cognitive impairment.

Results

Our results support the hypothesis that visuospatial and executive function have a significant impact on motor performance, with differences emerging between different functional groups on the various robot-based metrics. We also show that the kinematic metrics from this task differentiate cognitive-motor functional groups differently.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that performance on a motor-based robotic assessment task also involves a significant visuospatial and executive function component and highlights the need to account for cognitive impairment in the assessment of motor performance.

Source

, , , , , , , , ,

Leave a comment

[Abstract] Rehabilitation efficacy comparison of virtual reality technology and computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation in patients with post-stroke cognitive impairment: A network meta-analysis

Abstract

Objective

Virtual reality (VR) and computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation (CACR) are two emerging rehabilitation therapies for stroke patients. The aim of this study was to compare the rehabilitation efficacy of these two treatments for patients with post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI).

Methods

A network search of Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, VIP, WanFang Data, and CNKI databases was performed from their inception to February 2022 for screening randomized controlled trials related to VR and CACR in the treatment of PSCI. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk bias assessment tool. The primary outcomes of the included studies contained at least one of the following clinical outcome measures: Mini-mental state examination (MMSE) or Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). After screening the literature, assessing the quality and extracting the data, a network meta-analysis was performed with STATA software.

Results

A total of 21 randomized controlled trials were included, including 1,047 patients. The results of network meta-analysis showed that under MMSE index, VR group (p = 0.067) and CACR group (p = 0.054) tended to be superior to CT group, but it was not significant. Both the VR (p = 0.024) and CACR (p < 0.001) groups had significantly better outcomes compared to the conventional therapy group in terms of MoCA. The ranking results under both indicators showed that CACR had the best treatment effect, followed by VR.

Conclusion

In general, VR and CACR have superior efficacy compared with conventional therapy, in which CACR may be the best treatment option.

Source

, , , , , , ,

Leave a comment

[Abstract] Epidemiology of Cognitive impairment after stroke- natural history, risk factors, outcomes, treatments and interaction with depression – Thesis

Background Recovery from stroke poses physical and psychological challenges with significant consequences, not only on patients, but also on families, informal caregivers and stroke services. Early risk profiling, patient needs identification, and intervention of cognitive disorders could potentially offer increased psychological follow-up and support to those at risk.


Aims This PhD project aims to investigate the long-term natural history of post-stroke cognitive impairment, identify risk factors, treatments, outcomes, and interaction with depression.


Methods Study (i) is a systematic review of systematic reviews (umbrella review) of the risk factors and interventions to prevent cognitive decline in stroke patients. Studies (ii, iii and iv) analyse data from the South London Stroke Register, examining the natural history of post-stroke cognitive impairment, the association of primary and secondary preventive treatments as well as stroke management strategies on the risk of post-stroke cognitive impairment, and long-term outcomes in stroke patients with cognitive impairment, respectively. Study (v) uses stroke and cognition data (STROKOG), to generalise results of the fourth study on data from an international consortium. Study (vi) examine the interactions between post-stroke cognitive impairment and depression using stroke register. 

Results: Study (i), an umbrella review, included 22 systematic reviews. The major risk factorts of cognitive impairment included atrial fibrillation, leukoaraiosis, and multiple and recurrent strokes. The main interventions that could improve cognitive function were physical activity or cognitive rehabilitation.
Study (ii) found that the prevalence of cognitive impairment was around one-third and remained stable at this level within 15 years of follow up, with incidence ranging from 6% to 20%; almost two-thirds of the patients with cognitive impairment at stroke onset had recovered within the first year after stroke. Study (iii) found that admission to acute stroke unit and preventive treatment strategies especially with combined treatments of antihypertensive, lipid lowering and anti-thrombotic, were associated with significant risk reduction of cognitive impairment. Study (iv) observed that during the first three-months post-stoke, approximately one-third of these stroke survivors with cognitive impairment either cognitively improved (37%), deteriorated (30%), or remained unchanged (33%). Early presentation of cognitive impairment, and further deterioration in cognitive function within the first three months after stroke were associated significantly with negative health outcomes, including mortality, depression, physical dependency, being institutionalised and further cognitive decline. Study (v) generalise results of the study (iv) on international data from seven different countries. The pooled prevalence across international data was 28% (95% confidence interval=19%-37%). Compared to patients with normal cognitive function measured by MMSE or AMT at three months, there was a 47% increased risk of depression in patients with cognitive impairment (risk ratio (RR)=1.47, 95% CI=0.96-2.24), a 69% increased risk of further cognitive decline (RR=1.69, CI=1.56-1.83), a two-fold increased risk of physical dependence (RR=2.14, CI=1.20-3.81) and a close to three-fold increased risk of mortality (RR=2.71, CI=2.00-3.66) at one year. Study (vi) found that cognitive impairment interacts significantly with depression symptoms where the co-existence of both conditions was associated with a potential increased risk of negative outcomes.

Conclusion: This thesis provides an insight into the burden of post-stroke cognitive impairment, its risk factors, and the current state of evidence around prevention. Cognitive impairment after stroke is common and fluctuating, and is strongly associated with poor outcome, especially if depression symptoms co-exist. There is a need for research into interventions to prevent and early treat cognitive impairment; the research here suggests that good quality acute stroke care and secondary prevention is likely to be important in preserving cognitive status.

Source

, , ,

Leave a comment

[Abstract] Accelerated rTMS and cognitive training in chronic stroke: a safety and feasibility study

Abstract

Background: Nearly 70% of patients with chronic stroke demonstrate impairment in at least one cognitive domain. Effective cognitive rehabilitation approaches have been established for focal cortical deficits such as neglect and aphasia, but treatments for more prevalent and diffusely represented cognitive impairment remain elusive. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation is a promising intervention for targeting the multiple demand network that undergirds domain general cognitive processing. Furthermore, a delivery schedule readily paired with other rehabilitation interventions could be especially powerful. We examined the safety of accelerated rTMS as well as its feasibility in a delivery schedule interleaved with computerized cognitive training in individuals with chronic stroke and cognitive impairment.

Methods: Fourteen chronic stroke patients with intact left prefrontal cortex who met DSM-5 criteria for mild neurocognitive disorder completed open-label high-dose rTMS (intermittent theta burst) to left dlPFC (600 pulses, eight sessions/day for three days), interleaved every 15 minutes between cognitive training sessions. Participants completed at pre- and post-treatment: 1) neuroradiological lesion characterization and safety assessment with flair, diffusion, susceptibility, angiography, perfusion gradient and volumetric scans, 2) neuropsychological and psychosocial assessment as well as assessment of neglect and aphasia, and 3) ratings of treatment acceptability and credibility.

Results: No study-related adverse events occurred as indexed in neuroradiological, neuropsychological or subjective quantitative or qualitative report of side effects. Accelerated rTMS was rated as acceptable and credible with no more than minor discomfort in line with conventional once daily delivery schedules. Retention was feasible as all participants who began treatment completed.

Conclusions: This is the first comprehensive neuroradiological and neuropsychological examination of the safety of accelerated rTMS in chronic stroke, or any condition. Across objective and subjective indices, up to 24 sessions of accelerated intermittent theta burst rTMS was safe, acceptable, and tolerable, even in a neurologically vulnerable condition such as chronic stroke.

Source

, , , ,

Leave a comment

[Abstract] Designing stroke services for the delivery of cognitive rehabilitation: A qualitative study with stroke rehabilitation professionals

ABSTRACT

This qualitative study explored the potential to deliver cognitive rehabilitation for post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI), with a specific focus on barriers and facilitators to its delivery from the perspective of Irish stroke rehabilitation professionals.

Sixteen semi-structured interviews were completed with healthcare professionals in both hospital and community settings. The sample comprised physiotherapists, occupational therapists, nurses, a stroke physician, a psychologist, a neuropsychologist, a speech and language therapist, a dietician, and a public health nurse.

Interviews were audio-recorded and analysed in NVivo using inductive Thematic Analysis. Barriers and facilitators to the delivery of cognitive rehabilitation were identified and described under four key themes:

(i) Cognitive screening;

(ii) Cognitive rehabilitation: no one size fits all;

(iii) Psychology: the lost dimension of stroke rehabilitation; and

(iv) Joining the dots in the community.

Staffing required to deliver cognitive rehabilitation for PSCI was highlighted as under-resourced in the Republic of Ireland. Inadequate resourcing of neuropsychology and stroke-related psychological services, in particular, has had negative implications for the delivery of cognitive rehabilitation. Stroke-specific cognitive rehabilitation expertise is virtually inaccessible in the community, highlighting an urgent need for investment in specialist rehabilitation teams to deliver cognitive rehabilitation in this setting.

Source

, , , , ,

Leave a comment

[Abstract] The effects of computer‐assisted cognitive rehabilitation on cognitive impairment after stroke: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract

Objectives

To determine the effectiveness of computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation in improving cognitive function in patients with post-stroke cognitive impairment.

Background

In recent years, computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation has been accepted as a good substitute or supplement for traditional cognitive rehabilitation. Some clinical randomised controlled trials have been carried out, but no relevant systematic evaluations have been performed. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review of studies involving computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation to provide evidence-based data for its promotion and application.

Methods

Nine databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, OVID, Wanfang Data, CNKI, VIP and SinoMed databases) were systematically searched. Randomised controlled trials that assessed computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation for patients with post-stroke cognitive impairment were included. Two reviewers appraised the risks of bias through the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool and performed the meta-analysis, including the assessment of heterogeneity. We follow the PRISMA 2020 guidelines.

Results

Thirty-two studies comprising 1837 participants were included. Compared with conventional therapy alone, the addition of computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation significantly improved the global cognition of patients, evaluated using the Montreal cognitive assessment, mini-mental state examination and Loewenstein occupational therapy cognitive assessment (< .01 for all tests). The therapy also significantly improved activities of daily living, assessed using the Barthel index, modified Barthel index and functional independence measure (< .05 for all tests).

Conclusion

Computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation significantly improved the cognitive function and activities of daily living of patients with post-stroke cognitive impairment.

Relevance to clinical practice

Computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation can be a valuable technique for cognitive rehabilitation after stroke. It is advantageous for improving patient cognition and restoring the overall functional state of patients. Moreover, the research findings can provide suggestions and inspiration for researchers to implement the proposal, which is conducive to the design of more rigorous and high-quality randomised controlled trials.

Source

, , ,

Leave a comment

[Abstract] Effect of RehaCom cognitive rehabilitation software on working memory and processing speed in chronic ischemic stroke patients

Abstract

Stroke survivors need assistance to overcome cognitive impairments. Working memory (WM) and processing speed (PS) as two critical cognitive functions are disrupted by stroke. The goal of this study was to investigate the effect of RehaCom rehabilitation software on WM and PS in participants with chronic ischemic stroke with hemiplegia (right/left side). Participants were selected among stroke patients who were referred to our special rehabilitation clinic. Fifty participants were assigned to control (n = 25) and experimental (n = 25) groups. The results of the experimental group were compared with the control group before and after the treatment with RehaCom (ten 45-min sessions across five weeks, two sessions per week). The results showed a significant improvement in WM and PS in the experimental group in comparison with the control group after a 5-week training with RehaCom. In conclusion, our findings indicate that treatment with RehaCom software improves WM and PS in chronic ischemic stroke participants with hemiplegia. The exact mechanism of RehaCom is largely unknown and further studies are needed, but its effects on the function of brain regions involved in modulating cognitive functions such as the prefrontal cortex, cingulate cortex, and parietal cortex may be mechanisms of interest.

Source

, , , , , , , , ,

Leave a comment