Posts Tagged exoskeletons
[Abstract + References] Auto-LEE: A Novel Autonomous Lower Extremity Exoskeleton for Walking Assistance – IEEE Conference Publication
[Abstract + References] Do powered over-ground lower limb robotic exoskeletons affect outcomes in the rehabilitation of people with acquired brain injury?
Purpose: To assess the effects of lower limb robotic exoskeletons on outcomes in the rehabilitation of people with acquired brain injury.
Materials and methods: A systematic review of seven electronic databases was conducted. The primary outcome of interest was neuromuscular function. Secondary outcomes included quality of life, mood, acceptability and safety. Studies were assessed for methodological quality and recommendations were made using the GRADE system.
Results: Of 2469 identified studies, 13 (n = 322) were included in the review. Five contained data suitable for meta-analysis. When the data were pooled, there were no differences between exoskeleton and control for 6-Minute Walk Test, Timed Up and Go or 10-Meter Walk Test. Berg Balance Scale outcomes were significantly better in controls (MD = 2.74, CI = 1.12–4.36, p = 0.0009). There were no severe adverse events but drop-outs were 11.5% (n = 37). No studies reported the effect of robotic therapy on quality of life or mood. Methodological quality was on average fair (15.6/27 on Downs and Black Scale).
Conclusions: Only small numbers of people with acquired brain injury had data suitable for analysis. The available data suggests no more benefit for gait or balance with robotic therapy than conventional therapy. However, some important outcomes have not been studied and further well-conducted research is needed to determine whether such devices offer benefit over conventional therapy, in particular subgroups of those with acquired brain injury.
- Implications for Rehabilitation
- There is adequate evidence to recommend that powered over-ground lower limb robotic exoskeletons should not be used clinically in those with ABI, and that use should be restricted to research.
- Further research (controlled trials) with dependent ambulators is recommended.
- Research of other outcomes such as acceptability, spasticity, sitting posture, cardiorespiratory and psychological function, should be considered.
- Whyte E, Skidmore E, Aizenstein H. Cognitive impairment in acquired brain injury: a predictor of rehabilitation outcomes and an opportunity for novel interventions. PMR. 2011;3:S45–S51. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Google Scholar]
- States RA, Salem Y, Pappas E. Overground gait training for individuals with chronic stroke: a Cochrane systematic review. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2009;33:179–186. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
- Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, et al. Recovery of walking function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76:27–32. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
- (Australian) Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Management 2017 – Chapter 5 of 8: Rehabilitation [Internet]. Melbourne (VIC). Stroke Foundation; 2017 Dec 8 [cited 2018 Jan 23]. Available from: htttps://www.magicapp.org/app#guideline/2146/section/25236 [Google Scholar]
- Wall A, Borg J, Palmcrantz S. Clinical application of the hybrid assistive limb (HAL) for gait training – a systematic review. Front Syst Neurosci. 2015;9:48. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
- Kelley CP, Childress J, Boake C, et al. Over-ground and robotic-assisted locomotor training in adults with chronic stroke: a blinded randomized clinical trial. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013;8:161–168. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Google Scholar]
- Swinnen E, Beckwée D, Meeusen R, et al. Does robot-assisted gait rehabilitation improve balance in stroke patients? A systematic review Top Stroke Rehabil. 2014;21:87–100. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
- Cho DY, Park SW, Lee MJ, et al. Effects of robot-assisted gait training on the balance and gait of chronic stroke patients: focus on dependent ambulators. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27:3053–3057. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
- Wiart L, Rosychuk RJ, Wright FV. Evaluation of the effectiveness of robotic gait training and gait-focused physical therapy programs for children and youth with cerebral palsy: a mixed methods RCT. BMC Neurol. 2016;16:86. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
- Harvey LA. Physiotherapy rehabilitation for people with spinal cord injuries. J Physiother. 2016;62:4–11. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
- Buesing C, Fisch G, O’Donnell M, et al. Effects of wearable exoskeleton stride management assist system (SMA) on spatiotemporal gait characteristics in individuals after stroke: a randomised controlled trial. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil. 2015;12:101–113. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
- Spectrum. [Internet]. IEEE Spectrum; [cited 2017 May 15]. Available from: http://spectrum.ieee.org/the-human-os/biomedical/bionics/paraplegic-man-walks-in-ekso-robotic-exoskeleton-to-demo-its-killer-app. [Google Scholar]
- AlterG. [Internet]. [cited 2017 Oct 11]. Available from: http://www.alterg.com/products/bionic-leg/professional-physical-therapy [Google Scholar]
- Bortole M, Venkatakrishnan A, Zhu F, et al. The H2 robotic exoskeleton for gait rehabilitation after stroke: early findings from a clinical study. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil. 2015;12:1–14. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
- Esquenazi A, Talaty M, Jayaraman A. Powered exoskeletons for walking assistance in persons with central nervous system injuries: a narrative review. PMR. 2017;9:46–62. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Google Scholar]
- REX Bionics. [Internet]. Melbourne: Rex Bionics LTD; [cited 2017 May 20]. Available from: http://www.rexbionics.com/rex-for-clinical-use/. [Google Scholar]
- Esquenazi A, Talaty M, Packel A, et al. The ReWalk powered exoskeleton to restore ambulatory function to individuals with thoracic-level motor-complete spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;91:911–921. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
- Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg. 2010;8:336–341. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
- Downs SH, Black N. Feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52:377–384. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
- Baschung Pfister P, de Bruin ED, Tobler-Ammann BC, et al. The relevance of applying exercise training principles when designing therapeutic interventions for patients with inflammatory myopathies: a systematic review. Rheumatol Int. 2015;35:1641–1654. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
- National Health and Medical Research Council. [Internet]. Australia; Commonwealth of Australia 2017; [cited 2017 Jun 01]. https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines-publications/information-guideline-developers/resources-guideline-developers. [Google Scholar]
- Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. Chapter 12: interpreting results and drawing conclusions. In: Julian P.T. Higgins and Sally Green, Editor. Cochrane handbook;.Hoboken, US: John Wiley and Sons Ltd; 2017. p. 12.1–12.21. [Google Scholar]
- Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0. Hoboken, US: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557–560. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
- O’Connor SR, Tully MA, Ryan B, et al. Failure of a numerical quality assessment scale to identify potential risk of bias in a systematic review: a comparison study. BMC Res Notes. 2015;8:224. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Google Scholar]
- Stein J, Bishop L, Stein DJ, et al. Gait training with a robotic leg brace after stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;93:987–994. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
- Watanabe H, Goto R, Tanaka N, et al. Effects of gait training using the Hybrid Assistive Limb in recovery-phase stroke patients: a 2-month follow-up, randomised controlled study. NRE. 2017;40:363–367. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
- Yoshimoto T, Shimizu I, Hiroi Y, et al. Feasibility and efficacy of high-speed gait training with a voluntary driven exoskeleton robot for gait and balance dysfunction in patients with chronic stroke: non-randomised pilot study with concurrent control. Int J Rehabil Res. 2015;38:338–343. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
- Ogata T, Abe H, Samura K, et al. Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) Rehabilitation in patients with acute hemorrhagic stroke. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2015;55:901–906. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
- Yoshikawa K, Mizukami M, Kawamoto H, et al. Gait training with Hybrid Assistive Limb enhances the gait functions in subacute stroke patients: a pilot study. NeuroRehabilitation. 2017;40:87–97. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
- Kubota S, Nakata Y, Eguchi K, et al. Feasibility of rehabilitation training with a newly developed wearable robot for patients with limited mobility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:1080–1087. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
- Ueba T, Hamada O, Ogata T, et al. Feasibility and safety of acute phase rehabilitation after stroke using the Hybrid Assistive Limb robot suit. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2013;53:287–290. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
- Bernhardt J, Hayward KS, Kwakkel G, et al. Agreed definitions and a shared vision for new standards in stroke recovery research: the stroke recovery and rehabilitation roundtable taskforce. Int J Stroke. 2017;12:444–450. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
- Li L, Ding L, Chen N, et al. Improved walking ability with wearable robot-assisted training in patients suffering chronic stroke. BME. 2015;26:S329–S340. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
- Byl NN. Mobility training using a bionic knee orthosis in patients in a post-stroke chronic state: a case series. J Med Case Reports. 2012;6:1–5. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Google Scholar]
- Wong K, Bishop L, Stein J. A wearable robotic knee orthosis for gait training: a case-series of hemiparetic stroke survivors. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2012;36:113–120. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
- Kawamoto H, Kamibayashi K, Nakata Y, et al. Pilot Study of locomotion improvement using hybrid assistive limb in chronic stroke patients. BMC Neurol. 2013;13:141 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
- Dixon CJ, Knight T, Binns E, et al. Clinical measures of balance in people with type two diabetes: a systematic literature review. Gait Posture. 2017;58:325–332. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
- Donoghue D, Stokes EK, Murphy A, et al. How much change is true change? The minimum detectable change of the Berg Balance Scale in elderly people. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41:343–346. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
- Morone G, Iosa M, Bragoni M, et al. Who may have durable benefit from robotic gait training? A 2-year follow-up randomized controlled trial in patients with subacute stroke. Stroke. 2012;43:1140–1142. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
- Clinicaltrials.gov [Internet], United States; US National Library of Medicine [cited 2018 Jul 03]. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02943915 [Google Scholar]
- Holanda LJ, Silva PMM, Amorim TC, et al. Robotic assisted gait as a tool for rehabilitation of individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017;14:126. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
- Benson I, Hart K, Tussler D, et al. Lower-limb exoskeletons for individuals with chronic spinal cord injury: findings from a feasibility study. Clin Rehabil. 2016;30:73–84. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
[Abstract] A 5-Degrees-of-Freedom Lightweight Elbow-Wrist Exoskeleton for Forearm Fine-Motion Rehabilitation
[Abstract] Variable impedance control of finger exoskeleton for hand rehabilitation following stroke
[Abstract] An Elbow Exoskeleton for Upper Limb Rehabilitation With Series Elastic Actuator and Cable-Driven Differential
[ARTICLE] Voluntary control of wearable robotic exoskeletons by patients with paresis via neuromechanical modeling – Full Text
Research efforts in neurorehabilitation technologies have been directed towards creating robotic exoskeletons to restore motor function in impaired individuals. However, despite advances in mechatronics and bioelectrical signal processing, current robotic exoskeletons have had only modest clinical impact. A major limitation is the inability to enable exoskeleton voluntary control in neurologically impaired individuals. This hinders the possibility of optimally inducing the activity-driven neuroplastic changes that are required for recovery.
We have developed a patient-specific computational model of the human musculoskeletal system controlled via neural surrogates, i.e., electromyography-derived neural activations to muscles. The electromyography-driven musculoskeletal model was synthesized into a human-machine interface (HMI) that enabled poststroke and incomplete spinal cord injury patients to voluntarily control multiple joints in a multifunctional robotic exoskeleton in real time.
We demonstrated patients’ control accuracy across a wide range of lower-extremity motor tasks. Remarkably, an increased level of exoskeleton assistance always resulted in a reduction in both amplitude and variability in muscle activations as well as in the mechanical moments required to perform a motor task. Since small discrepancies in onset time between human limb movement and that of the parallel exoskeleton would potentially increase human neuromuscular effort, these results demonstrate that the developed HMI precisely synchronizes the device actuation with residual voluntary muscle contraction capacity in neurologically impaired patients.
Continuous voluntary control of robotic exoskeletons (i.e. event-free and task-independent) has never been demonstrated before in populations with paretic and spastic-like muscle activity, such as those investigated in this study. Our proposed methodology may open new avenues for harnessing residual neuromuscular function in neurologically impaired individuals via symbiotic wearable robots.
The ability to walk directly relates to quality of life. Neurological lesions such as those underlying stroke and spinal cord injury (SCI) often result in severe motor impairments (i.e., paresis, spasticity, abnormal joint couplings) that compromise an individual’s motor capacity and health throughout the life span. For several decades, scientific effort in rehabilitation robotics has been directed towards exoskeletons that can help enhance motor capacity in neurologically impaired individuals. However, despite advances in mechatronics and bioelectrical signal processing, current robotic exoskeletons have had limited performance when tested in healthy individuals  and have achieved only modest clinical impact in neurologically impaired patients , e.g., stroke [3, 4], SCI patients . […]
[Abstract + References] eConHand: A Wearable Brain-Computer Interface System for Stroke Rehabilitation
2. E. Donchin , K. Spencer and R. Wijesinghe , “The mental prosthesis: assessing the speed of a P300-based brain-computer interface”, IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 174-179, 2000.
3. D. McFarland and J. Wolpaw , “Brain-Computer Interface Operation of Robotic and Prosthetic Devices”, Computer, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 52-56, 2008.
4. Xiaorong Gao , Dingfeng Xu , Ming Cheng and Shangkai Gao , “A bci-based environmental controller for the motion-disabled”, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 137-140, 2003.
5. A. Ramos-Murguialday , D. Broetz , M. Rea et al “Brain-machine interface in chronic stroke rehabilitation: A controlled study”, Annals of Neurology, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 100-108, 2013.
6. F. Pichiorri , G. Morone , M. Petti et al “Brain-computer interface boosts motor imagery practice during stroke recovery”, Annals of Neurology, vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 851-865, 2015.
7. M. A. Cervera , S. R. Soekadar , J. Ushiba et al “Brain-computer interfaces for post-stroke motor rehabilitation: a meta-analysis”, Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 651-663, 2018.
8. K. Ang , K. Chua , K. Phua et al “A Randomized Controlled Trial of EEG-Based Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface Robotic Rehabilitation for Stroke”, Clinical EEG and Neuroscience, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 310-320, 2014.
9. N. Bhagat , A. Venkatakrishnan , B. Abibullaev et al “Design and Optimization of an EEG-Based Brain Machine Interface (BMI) to an Upper-Limb Exoskeleton for Stroke Survivors”, Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 10, pp. 122, 2016.
10. J. Webb , Z. G. Xiao , K. P. Aschenbrenner , G. Herrnstadt , and C. Menon , “Towards a portable assistive arm exoskeleton for stroke patient rehabilitation controlled through a brain computer interface”, in Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob), 2012 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference, pp. 1299-1304, 2012.
11. A. L. Coffey , D. J. Leamy , and T. E. Ward , “A novel BCI-controlled pneumatic glove system for home-based neurorehabilitation”, in Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE, pp. 3622-3625, 2014.
12. D. Bundy , L. Souders , K. Baranyai et al “Contralesional Brain-Computer Interface Control of a Powered Exoskeleton for Motor Recovery in Chronic Stroke Survivors”, Stroke, vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 1908-1915, 2017.
13. X. Shu , S. Chen , L. Yao et al “Fast Recognition of BCI-Inefficient Users Using Physiological Features from EEG Signals: A Screening Study of Stroke Patients”, Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 12, pp. 93, 2018.
14. A. Delorme , T. Mullen , C. Kothe et al “EEGLAB, SIFT, NFT, BCILAB, and ERICA: New Tools for Advanced EEG Processing”, Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, vol. 2011, pp. 1-12, 2011.
15. G. Schalk , D. McFarland , T. Hinterberger , N. Birbaumer and J. Wolpaw , “BCI2000: A General-Purpose Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) System”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1034-1043, 2004.
16. M. H. B. Azhar , A. Casey , and M. Sakel , “A cost-effective BCI assisted technology framework for neurorehabilitation”, The Seventh International Conference on Global Health Challenges, 18th-22nd November, 2018. (In Press)
17. C. M. McCrimmon , M. Wang , L. S. Lopes et al “A small, portable, battery-powered brain-computer interface system for motor rehabilitation”, Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 2776-2779, 2016.
18. J. Meng , B. Edelman , J. Olsoe et al “A Study of the Effects of Electrode Number and Decoding Algorithm on Online EEG-Based BCI Behavioral Performance”, Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 12, pp. 227, 2018.
19. T. Mullen , C. Kothe , Y. Chi et al “Real-time neuroimaging and cognitive monitoring using wearable dry EEG”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 62, no. 11, pp. 2553-2567, 2015.
[Abstract] Decoupling Finger Joint Motion in an Exoskeletal Hand: A Design for Robot-assisted Rehabilitation
In this study, a cable-driven exoskeleton device is developed for stroke patients to enable them to perform passive range of motion exercises and teleoperation rehabilitation of their impaired hands. Each exoskeleton finger is controlled by an actuator via two cables. The motions between the metacarpophalangeal and distal/proximal interphalangeal joints are decoupled, through which the movement pattern is analogous to that observed in the human hand. A dynamic model based on the Lagrange method is derived to estimate how cable tension varies with the angular position of the finger joints. Two discernable phases are observed, each of which reflects the motion of the metacarpophalangeal and distal/proximal interphalangeal joints. The tension profiles of exoskeleton fingers predicted by the Lagrange model are verified through a mechatronic integrated platform. The model can precisely estimate the tensions at different movement velocities, and it shows that the characteristics of two independent phases remain the same even for a variety of movement velocities. The feasibility for measuring resistance when manipulating a patient’s finger is demonstrated in human experiments. Specifically, the net force required to move a subject’s finger joints can be accounted for by the Lagrange model.